NZ
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2016 4:18 pm
I bet they're farkin quaking.
We have a midweek game so anything is possible.UKHamlet wrote:I think we'll be butfucked so hard they might win 4-0 despite us only playing 3.
That game is against the Chiefs: 2 championships in the last 4 years, just beat a shadow Pumas team (14 of the Jaguares starting XV were in the Pumas RWC squad , I think) and Arg are ranked less than 1 point behind Wales.Sandydragon wrote:We have a midweek game so anything is possible.UKHamlet wrote:I think we'll be butfucked so hard they might win 4-0 despite us only playing 3.
Very impressive from the little we've seen so far. Hopefully he can put in some more eyecatching performances before the end of the season. Might be a better prospect than Amos, but very early days.hawkaye wrote:I saw Steff Evans on TV score a couple of good tries a few weeks ago - is he a real contender? Seemed to have genuine pace and elusiveness.
Well, sending a bunch of 2nd and 3rd stringers south under a coach with a clear vision seemed to (briefly) pay off for England in 1998. I'm not sure that Welsh fans have the patience to wait 5 years for the payoff, or that Gatland intends to be around for that long.Sourdust wrote:IMO sending the first choice squad down south is not just pointless, but tantamount to criminal negligence.
Our players are knackered, that much is obvious. As a squad they're past their prime, and while I wouldn't dispense with many (if any) of them yet, we desperately need some fresh blood and to let players like AWJ and Faletau have a couple of weeks on a beach.
Please don't tell me we need our full squad to beat the All Blacks. A scratch squad of fired-up youngsters has just as much chance, i.e. none at all. And we might just get a few of them battle-hardened enough to make an impact next year.
This just does not compute, man.Sourdust wrote:IMO sending the first choice squad down south is not just pointless, but tantamount to criminal negligence.
Our players are knackered, that much is obvious. As a squad they're past their prime, and while I wouldn't dispense with many (if any) of them yet, we desperately need some fresh blood and to let players like AWJ and Faletau have a couple of weeks on a beach.
Please don't tell me we need our full squad to beat the All Blacks. A scratch squad of fired-up youngsters has just as much chance, i.e. none at all. And we might just get a few of them battle-hardened enough to make an impact next year.
Yup. We need a velvet revolution...preferably a ginger velvet.Lizard wrote:Well, sending a bunch of 2nd and 3rd stringers south under a coach with a clear vision seemed to (briefly) pay off for England in 1998. I'm not sure that Welsh fans have the patience to wait 5 years for the payoff, or that Gatland intends to be around for that long.Sourdust wrote:IMO sending the first choice squad down south is not just pointless, but tantamount to criminal negligence.
Our players are knackered, that much is obvious. As a squad they're past their prime, and while I wouldn't dispense with many (if any) of them yet, we desperately need some fresh blood and to let players like AWJ and Faletau have a couple of weeks on a beach.
Please don't tell me we need our full squad to beat the All Blacks. A scratch squad of fired-up youngsters has just as much chance, i.e. none at all. And we might just get a few of them battle-hardened enough to make an impact next year.
I would rather see your best players, please. Smacking a bunch of schoolboys around will be no sort of preparation for the Championship.
But then, it's also a Chiefs team that will be short of:Lizard wrote:That game is against the Chiefs: 2 championships in the last 4 years, just beat a shadow Pumas team (14 of the Jaguares starting XV were in the Pumas RWC squad , I think) and Arg are ranked less than 1 point behind Wales.Sandydragon wrote:We have a midweek game so anything is possible.UKHamlet wrote:I think we'll be butfucked so hard they might win 4-0 despite us only playing 3.
May the best team win.
We'll send out the seconds thencashead wrote:But then, it's also a Chiefs team that will be short of:Lizard wrote:That game is against the Chiefs: 2 championships in the last 4 years, just beat a shadow Pumas team (14 of the Jaguares starting XV were in the Pumas RWC squad , I think) and Arg are ranked less than 1 point behind Wales.Sandydragon wrote: We have a midweek game so anything is possible.
May the best team win.
Brodallick, Cane, Leitch, Yamashita (assuming they get called up for Japan), TKB, Cruden, Ngatai, SBW, probably Pauliasi Manu, and possibly others like Damien McKenzie, Lowe, Tamanivalu and Nathan Harris. That's not to mention a few others being unavailable due to 7s like Gus Pulu.
I suspect that game has been earmarked for wider squad members to have a go. with 5 Wales games during the summer tour, including the visit to Twickenham, our senior squad are going to be f*cked by the end of that. Then its a short rest before the new season, which happens to be a Lions year. As much as I want to put a strong team out against the ABs and be at least competitive, I don't want our senior players taking part in 5 games. The England game and the Chiefs game should be developmental. If Gatland has any sense, he will speak to Eddie Jones and bill the game at Twickenham as just that - it suits the English too not to knacker out their first XV.UKHamlet wrote:We'll send out the seconds thencashead wrote:But then, it's also a Chiefs team that will be short of:Lizard wrote: That game is against the Chiefs: 2 championships in the last 4 years, just beat a shadow Pumas team (14 of the Jaguares starting XV were in the Pumas RWC squad , I think) and Arg are ranked less than 1 point behind Wales.
May the best team win.
Brodallick, Cane, Leitch, Yamashita (assuming they get called up for Japan), TKB, Cruden, Ngatai, SBW, probably Pauliasi Manu, and possibly others like Damien McKenzie, Lowe, Tamanivalu and Nathan Harris. That's not to mention a few others being unavailable due to 7s like Gus Pulu.