RugbyRebels

Otherwise known as "The reason Argentina are guaranteed a Twickenham fixture each year because we need to show it off to sell it and we've done our good deed to Fiji for this century."

http://www.punditarena.com/rugby/smcmah ... amn-slick/

I've seen a lot worse, although the explanation for the "red fade" sounds like complete bollocks. No doubt the Kiwis will start crying again about us disrespecting them by using black, which is a bonus.

Puja

Awful. I can't stand the bull**** marketing blurb that comes with it.

Not that bad, and infinitely better than the Irish change kit.

If they're right about the red fade should teams be told not to do that on grounds of safety?

Mellsblue wrote:Awful. I can't stand the bull**** marketing blurb that comes with it.

I can't stand the marketing bolloc%s either, but I like the kit. Definitely better than last year's ugly blue kit.

Why can't we have some traditional horizontal stripes in red, white and blue?

Save your money:

Is the number of times worn important? I'd rather just get something I like the look of.

I liked the purple shirts. Surely time they made a comeback?

It's not really a replica kit if it's never been worn. I'd argue the same for a kit that been worn once. You must be a marketing man's (or lady's) dream