Page 4 of 11

Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 6:11 pm
by Mellsblue
Big D wrote:It's an interesting debate, wee Heathcote and Jones are clear outliers on the eligibility front.

Not educated or lived in Scotland for any great length of time (days in TH case) but you can't really raise the eligibility rules higher than born in the country.

You can't change that either. To slightly contrive a situation that is clearly different to TH and Jones but why I think these outliers just need to be accepted as things that will happen. I have a 2 year old and a 2 day old. Say I moved next week to Australia for good, and they grew up to be international class. If I raised them to be proud of their Scottish roots why shouldn't they be able to play for Scotland.
If they're international class then they're really too good to be wasting their time with Scotland ;)

Re: RE: Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 6:14 pm
by Big D
Mellsblue wrote:
Big D wrote:It's an interesting debate, wee Heathcote and Jones are clear outliers on the eligibility front.

Not educated or lived in Scotland for any great length of time (days in TH case) but you can't really raise the eligibility rules higher than born in the country.

You can't change that either. To slightly contrive a situation that is clearly different to TH and Jones but why I think these outliers just need to be accepted as things that will happen. I have a 2 year old and a 2 day old. Say I moved next week to Australia for good, and they grew up to be international class. If I raised them to be proud of their Scottish roots why shouldn't they be able to play for Scotland.
If they're international class then they're really too good to be wasting their time with Scotland ;)
[emoji35] [emoji6]

Re: RE: Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 6:33 pm
by hugh_woatmeigh
Big D wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:
Big D wrote:It's an interesting debate, wee Heathcote and Jones are clear outliers on the eligibility front.

Not educated or lived in Scotland for any great length of time (days in TH case) but you can't really raise the eligibility rules higher than born in the country.

You can't change that either. To slightly contrive a situation that is clearly different to TH and Jones but why I think these outliers just need to be accepted as things that will happen. I have a 2 year old and a 2 day old. Say I moved next week to Australia for good, and they grew up to be international class. If I raised them to be proud of their Scottish roots why shouldn't they be able to play for Scotland.
If they're international class then they're really too good to be wasting their time with Scotland ;)
[emoji35] [emoji6]
Is this hypothetical? If not congrats on the new arrival ...

Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 6:51 pm
by Big D
The situation was hypothetical but I do have a 2 day old. Cheers.

Mells, keep an eye out he's eligible for England (and Ireland) too ;-)

This one is born in the Glasgow Caley region. The one born in Edinburgh is waiting out his residency period :-)

Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 6:53 pm
by Big D
Is Jones tied if he tours or does he need to make a match day 23?

Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 6:59 pm
by hugh_woatmeigh
Big D wrote:Is Jones tied if he tours or does he need to make a match day 23?
Good point. I'm sure that McKibbin was no longer SQ after he was included in an Aussie squad at some point?

Having said that, Muldowney has been in an A squad before but the Irish lot seem to think he is qualified.

He'll get a cap anyway.

Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 7:14 pm
by hp18
Needs to make the bench.

Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 8:07 pm
by Adder
Is Wales the only team in the 6 nations without a South African (trained) player?
It's incredible how many International team have South African Elements. What is so different with the way they are taught Rugby?

Congratulations Big D on the New Born!!! (let me know if it gets easier with the second one ;) )

Re: RE: Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 8:19 pm
by Big D
hp18 wrote:Needs to make the bench.
Adder wrote:Is Wales the only team in the 6 nations without a South African (trained) player?
It's incredible how many International team have South African Elements. What is so different with the way they are taught Rugby?

Congratulations Big D on the New Born!!! (let me know if it gets easier with the second one ;) )
Will do.

Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 8:42 pm
by OptimisticJock
Big D wrote:It's an interesting debate, wee Heathcote and Jones are clear outliers on the eligibility front.

Not educated or lived in Scotland for any great length of time (days in TH case) but you can't really raise the eligibility rules higher than born in the country.

You can't change that either. To slightly contrive a situation that is clearly different to TH and Jones but why I think these outliers just need to be accepted as things that will happen. I have a 2 year old and a 2 day old. Say I moved next week to Australia for good, and they grew up to be international class. If I raised them to be proud of their Scottish roots why shouldn't they be able to play for Scotland.
Congratulations mate.

I agree with you but how do you prove that?

Re: RE: Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 8:46 pm
by Big D
OptimisticJock wrote:
Congratulations mate.

I agree with you but how do you prove that?
Cheers.

I think the rules just need to be tightened with respect to residency length and maybe 2 grandparents rather 1 for example. But for place of birth I think we just have to accept that there will be rare cases where someone is born in a country that they may have no real tie too other than parents worked/holidayed there for a short period.

Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 9:02 pm
by hugh_woatmeigh
Adder wrote:Is Wales the only team in the 6 nations without a South African (trained) player?
It's incredible how many International team have South African Elements. What is so different with the way they are taught Rugby?

Congratulations Big D on the New Born!!! (let me know if it gets easier with the second one ;) )
Hardly unique to SA. How about NZ? Maitland, Payne and Anscombe are all currently in the international picture for their respective sides. Suppose you could argue Harrison for England too but I'm not sure he was ever a full professional in NZ.

Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Sat May 28, 2016 6:55 am
by Adder
I see what you mean, but Kiwis tend to have the odd grandmother.

Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Sat May 28, 2016 8:47 am
by hugh_woatmeigh
Adder wrote:I see what you mean, but Kiwis tend to have the odd grandmother.
Fair point. The Irish do seem to take on a lot of project players though - Payne was one in fact, he had no granny.

I think we take on more projects now though..

Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Sat May 28, 2016 9:22 am
by Eugene Wrayburn
OptimisticJock wrote:
Big D wrote:It's an interesting debate, wee Heathcote and Jones are clear outliers on the eligibility front.

Not educated or lived in Scotland for any great length of time (days in TH case) but you can't really raise the eligibility rules higher than born in the country.

You can't change that either. To slightly contrive a situation that is clearly different to TH and Jones but why I think these outliers just need to be accepted as things that will happen. I have a 2 year old and a 2 day old. Say I moved next week to Australia for good, and they grew up to be international class. If I raised them to be proud of their Scottish roots why shouldn't they be able to play for Scotland.
Congratulations mate.

I agree with you but how do you prove that?
You don't, which is why the rules are a compromise between allowing for the fact that some may have been brought up in that way and preventing a flag of convenience. I personally think the balance isn't quite right, but that's by the by.

And CONGRATULATIONS BIG D! We'll have the Ireland qualified one if he's any good.

Re: RE: Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Sat May 28, 2016 9:31 am
by Big D
Eugene Wrayburn wrote:
OptimisticJock wrote:
Big D wrote:It's an interesting debate, wee Heathcote and Jones are clear outliers on the eligibility front.

Not educated or lived in Scotland for any great length of time (days in TH case) but you can't really raise the eligibility rules higher than born in the country.

You can't change that either. To slightly contrive a situation that is clearly different to TH and Jones but why I think these outliers just need to be accepted as things that will happen. I have a 2 year old and a 2 day old. Say I moved next week to Australia for good, and they grew up to be international class. If I raised them to be proud of their Scottish roots why shouldn't they be able to play for Scotland.
Congratulations mate.

I agree with you but how do you prove that?
You don't, which is why the rules are a compromise between allowing for the fact that some may have been brought up in that way and preventing a flag of convenience. I personally think the balance isn't quite right, but that's by the by.

And CONGRATULATIONS BIG D! We'll have the Ireland qualified one if he's any good.
Cheers Eug.

Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Sat May 28, 2016 10:22 am
by Cameo
Big D wrote:It's an interesting debate, wee Heathcote and Jones are clear outliers on the eligibility front.

Not educated or lived in Scotland for any great length of time (days in TH case) but you can't really raise the eligibility rules higher than born in the country.

You can't change that either. To slightly contrive a situation that is clearly different to TH and Jones but why I think these outliers just need to be accepted as things that will happen. I have a 2 year old and a 2 day old. Say I moved next week to Australia for good, and they grew up to be international class. If I raised them to be proud of their Scottish roots why shouldn't they be able to play for Scotland.
Congratulations.

100% agree. Nationality is a tricky one so you'll never get rules that are perfect or fit in with everyone's ideas. Like eugene I would change the residency one but under any rules Huw Jones would be eligible.

My idea has always been for people to have to make a decision when they sign their first professional contract as I think that would stop the embarassing cases of people trying to get in one team, failing and then settling for Scotland. I dont know if you have any views on that from an employment law angle Eugene?

Re: RE: Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Sat May 28, 2016 10:31 am
by Big D
Cameo wrote:
Big D wrote:It's an interesting debate, wee Heathcote and Jones are clear outliers on the eligibility front.

Not educated or lived in Scotland for any great length of time (days in TH case) but you can't really raise the eligibility rules higher than born in the country.

You can't change that either. To slightly contrive a situation that is clearly different to TH and Jones but why I think these outliers just need to be accepted as things that will happen. I have a 2 year old and a 2 day old. Say I moved next week to Australia for good, and they grew up to be international class. If I raised them to be proud of their Scottish roots why shouldn't they be able to play for Scotland.
Congratulations.

100% agree. Nationality is a tricky one so you'll never get rules that are perfect or fit in with everyone's ideas. Like eugene I would change the residency one but under any rules Huw Jones would be eligible.

My idea has always been for people to have to make a decision when they sign their first professional contract as I think that would stop the embarassing cases of people trying to get in one team, failing and then settling for Scotland. I dont know if you have any views on that from an employment law angle Eugene?
Cheers.

I'm not sure the residency rule can fully go away but rather than 1st pro contract (which we have seen could be at 16/17 with Richie) was have 2 layers. If you move country before 16/18 then 3 years as it is. And older than 16/18 then it could be say 5 years which would be 2 world cups.

Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Sat May 28, 2016 10:32 am
by Big D
In saying that. We probably don't want to sidetrack the tour thread with eligibility chat.

Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Sat May 28, 2016 10:33 am
by Big D
Going back to Jones. Do you think he was approached before then initial squad was announced? If so, I'd have wanted him in the original party.

Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Sat May 28, 2016 11:23 am
by Eugene Wrayburn
I may have missed this but where are your games being televised?

Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Sat May 28, 2016 12:11 pm
by hugh_woatmeigh
Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I may have missed this but where are your games being televised?
BBC Scotland has both games.

Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Sat May 28, 2016 6:18 pm
by Eugene Wrayburn
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:
Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I may have missed this but where are your games being televised?
BBC Scotland has both games.
Cheers

Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 8:58 am
by Big D
Gray Snr travelling separate from main squad. Will play for Castres next weekend then fly out regardless of result.

Re: Japan Tour

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2016 12:06 am
by Big D
Some decent performances by the other 6N teams last week.

Haven't seen the RG V Italy game but looks close on scoreboard.