Argentina tour

[Beasties]

Pepper should start the first test at 6 for me. Given how we’ve lined up in the 6N to good success, Pepper at 6 offering a third lineout option plus BCurry at 7 is the best continuity. Willis obviously at 8. Would have Ilione on the bench with Underhill and Ted Hill.

I thought TDG was excellent today. Far superior to Steward who looks incredibly limited now his super strength is being negated by people getting to him in the air now.

Heyes had a good game which was nice to see, he’s starting to get near his prime as a prop and would be great to see him kick on like Stuart.

Those championing Radwan probably saw why he won’t be picking as he tried and failed miserably to put down Pepper…

Chat GPT confirms this wasn’t jngf.

[Danno]

Chat GPT is a lying piece of shit though

[Banquo]

My thought on this is that we were absolutely at our best under Borthwick this 6N when we deployed two opensides or at best one openside and one 6.5. The time before that we were at our best was at the 2019 World Cup with the same.

We have an absolute abundance of 6.5s/7s and should be tailoring a game plan accordingly. Playing CCS or Hill at 6 is a big departure from that set up. We should not be getting ourselves into a position whereby Tcurry is first choice 6 but the minute he’s injured or needs a rest, we completely change backrow balance. Pepper and Ilione for me both look like serious 6 options behind TCurry (lineout, breakdown, reasonable tight carrying) with BCurry, Earl, Underhill and Pollock at 7.

If the height of your ambition is looking good in the 6n while finishing second fine. But imo we need more carrying or a point of difference up front. Both Pepper and Ilione have spent most of their time as 7’s as far as I can tell, with a balancing 6 and 8.

We don’t have a big carrying 6 outside of CCS who doesn’t do the nuts and bolts of a back rower well enough.

Ted Hill barely carries the ball and certainly doesn’t do so in the tight.

So we make use of what we have. Tcurry 6, pollock 7, Willis 8 looks the way forward for me. I assume that would have enough carrying and point of difference.

We’d still have no-one to back up TCurry at 6 if we limit ourselves to not picking players who play 7 for their clubs.

So we need a look at Pepper and or Ilione to play at 6 if we want a continued dual threat at the breakdown.

Exactly what are these nuts and bolts CCS doesn’t do? Seems odd he’s managed to become an established international and prem player without them?
You’ll note I said carrying OR a point of difference- Ted Hill has a distinct point of difference.
IF you want to play two opensides that’s up to you. Not for me, esp if you want to beat the likes of SA.

[Beasties]

The eternal debate.
I’m happy we’ve got loads of quality options now.
I’m not comfortable with Chessum at 6 as an answer though.

[Mikey Brown]

At least we can agree Pollock has the 7 shirt sewn up.

[Puja]

The eternal debate.
I’m happy we’ve got loads of quality options now.
I’m not comfortable with Chessum at 6 as an answer though.

Agreed - we've got TCurry, BCurry, Underhill, Earl, Pollock, Kenningham, CCS, Pepper, Pearson, Ilione that we somehow have to fit into two flank positions and we're still talking about using one of them on a lock?

Puja

[Banquo]

The eternal debate.
I’m happy we’ve got loads of quality options now.
I’m not comfortable with Chessum at 6 as an answer though.

Agreed - we've got TCurry, BCurry, Underhill, Earl, Pollock, Kenningham, CCS, Pepper, Pearson, Ilione that we somehow have to fit into two flank positions and we're still talking about using one of them on a lock?

Puja

Yus. Tho CCS is a apparently a lock now, confusingly