Page 3 of 3

Re: Glos V Bath Friday

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2023 4:28 pm
by Banquo
Which Tyler wrote: Sun Nov 12, 2023 4:09 pm Isn't Dingwall another "not an IC" though?
why?

Re: Glos V Bath Friday

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2023 7:01 pm
by Which Tyler
Because... he mostly plays outside centre?

Re: Glos V Bath Friday

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2023 8:08 pm
by Banquo
Which Tyler wrote: Sun Nov 12, 2023 7:01 pm Because... he mostly plays outside centre?
Nope. He’s played inside loads, including today. He and Hutchinson for example mix up in and out depending on move and phase. He was originally selected at 12 today with Freeman outside him, but Ramm was ill so Freeman went on the wing. But he still appeared at inside more often than not, as he did last season. When Proctor was in the centre, Fraser always played inside. He’s equally happy at inside and outside.

Re: Glos V Bath Friday

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2023 8:08 pm
by Banquo
Which Tyler wrote: Sun Nov 12, 2023 7:01 pm Because... he mostly plays outside centre?
Nope. He’s played inside loads, including today. He and Hutchinson for example mix up in and out depending on move and phase. He was originally selected at 12 today with Freeman outside him, but Ramm was ill so Freeman went on the wing. But he still appeared at inside more often than not, as he did last season. When Proctor was in the centre, Fraser always played inside. He’s equally happy at inside and outside.

Re: Glos V Bath Friday

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2023 9:13 pm
by Mellsblue
Banquo wrote: Sun Nov 12, 2023 8:08 pm
Which Tyler wrote: Sun Nov 12, 2023 7:01 pm Because... he mostly plays outside centre?
Nope. He’s played inside loads, including today. He and Hutchinson for example mix up in and out depending on move and phase. He was originally selected at 12 today with Freeman outside him, but Ramm was ill so Freeman went on the wing. But he still appeared at inside more often than not, as he did last season. When Proctor was in the centre, Fraser always played inside. He’s equally happy at inside and outside.
He is named 13 on the team sheet when paired with Hutchinson which may be the cause of confusion but, yeah, what you’ve said… plus I’ll be cruel and say he has to defend at 13 when playing with Hutchinson as Hutchinson is a liability there.

Re: Glos V Bath Friday

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2023 9:21 pm
by Banquo
Mellsblue wrote: Sun Nov 12, 2023 9:13 pm
Banquo wrote: Sun Nov 12, 2023 8:08 pm
Which Tyler wrote: Sun Nov 12, 2023 7:01 pm Because... he mostly plays outside centre?
Nope. He’s played inside loads, including today. He and Hutchinson for example mix up in and out depending on move and phase. He was originally selected at 12 today with Freeman outside him, but Ramm was ill so Freeman went on the wing. But he still appeared at inside more often than not, as he did last season. When Proctor was in the centre, Fraser always played inside. He’s equally happy at inside and outside.
He is named 13 on the team sheet when paired with Hutchinson which may be the cause of confusion but, yeah, what you’ve said… plus I’ll be cruel and say he has to defend at 13 when playing with Hutchinson as Hutchinson is a liability there.
That also gets mixed up depending on phase and field position.

Re: Glos V Bath Friday

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2023 9:25 pm
by Mellsblue
Banquo wrote: Sun Nov 12, 2023 9:21 pm
Mellsblue wrote: Sun Nov 12, 2023 9:13 pm
Banquo wrote: Sun Nov 12, 2023 8:08 pm

Nope. He’s played inside loads, including today. He and Hutchinson for example mix up in and out depending on move and phase. He was originally selected at 12 today with Freeman outside him, but Ramm was ill so Freeman went on the wing. But he still appeared at inside more often than not, as he did last season. When Proctor was in the centre, Fraser always played inside. He’s equally happy at inside and outside.
He is named 13 on the team sheet when paired with Hutchinson which may be the cause of confusion but, yeah, what you’ve said… plus I’ll be cruel and say he has to defend at 13 when playing with Hutchinson as Hutchinson is a liability there.
That also gets mixed up depending on phase and field position.
Nowhere near rigid enough, it’ll never catch on. :)

Re: Glos V Bath Friday

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2023 12:03 am
by Which Tyler
Oh Jonny

Re: Glos V Bath Friday

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2023 1:00 am
by Spiffy
If you happened to miss it, the whole game is up on Youtube. A good watch :


Re: Glos V Bath Friday

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2023 4:15 pm
by Which Tyler
Which Tyler wrote: Wed Nov 15, 2023 12:03 am Oh Jonny
banned for 6 weeks, reduced to 3.

Lawrence (unsurprisingly) with a broken nose.
Might be a chance for Redpath & Ojomoh in the midfield

Re: Glos V Bath Friday

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2023 5:22 pm
by fivepointer
Doesnt he get a week off for attending tackle school? Ridiculous.

Re: Glos V Bath Friday

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2023 5:32 pm
by Puja
Which Tyler wrote: Wed Nov 15, 2023 4:15 pm
Which Tyler wrote: Wed Nov 15, 2023 12:03 am Oh Jonny
banned for 6 weeks, reduced to 3.

Lawrence (unsurprisingly) with a broken nose.
Might be a chance for Redpath & Ojomoh in the midfield
Weird offence - just sheer malcoordination of a kind that makes you think of 20 year old May, who couldn't always get his limbs sorted out. Hope Lawrence is only out for a week or so.

Puja

Re: Glos V Bath Friday

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2023 8:01 pm
by Which Tyler
Puja wrote: Wed Nov 15, 2023 5:32 pm Weird offence - just sheer malcoordination of a kind that makes you think of 20 year old May, who couldn't always get his limbs sorted out. Hope Lawrence is only out for a week or so.
There's a post on shedweb basically saying that if things had happened differently, then the result would have been different, therefore no offence, and the TMO was right to not even look at it.

Re: Glos V Bath Friday

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2023 8:05 pm
by Puja
Which Tyler wrote: Wed Nov 15, 2023 8:01 pm
Puja wrote: Wed Nov 15, 2023 5:32 pm Weird offence - just sheer malcoordination of a kind that makes you think of 20 year old May, who couldn't always get his limbs sorted out. Hope Lawrence is only out for a week or so.
There's a post on shedweb basically saying that if things had happened differently, then the result would have been different, therefore no offence, and the TMO was right to not even look at it.
How are they enjoying their time-travelling holiday from 2015?

Puja