Re: Glos V Bath Friday
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2023 4:28 pm
why?
why?
Nope. He’s played inside loads, including today. He and Hutchinson for example mix up in and out depending on move and phase. He was originally selected at 12 today with Freeman outside him, but Ramm was ill so Freeman went on the wing. But he still appeared at inside more often than not, as he did last season. When Proctor was in the centre, Fraser always played inside. He’s equally happy at inside and outside.
Nope. He’s played inside loads, including today. He and Hutchinson for example mix up in and out depending on move and phase. He was originally selected at 12 today with Freeman outside him, but Ramm was ill so Freeman went on the wing. But he still appeared at inside more often than not, as he did last season. When Proctor was in the centre, Fraser always played inside. He’s equally happy at inside and outside.
He is named 13 on the team sheet when paired with Hutchinson which may be the cause of confusion but, yeah, what you’ve said… plus I’ll be cruel and say he has to defend at 13 when playing with Hutchinson as Hutchinson is a liability there.Banquo wrote: ↑Sun Nov 12, 2023 8:08 pmNope. He’s played inside loads, including today. He and Hutchinson for example mix up in and out depending on move and phase. He was originally selected at 12 today with Freeman outside him, but Ramm was ill so Freeman went on the wing. But he still appeared at inside more often than not, as he did last season. When Proctor was in the centre, Fraser always played inside. He’s equally happy at inside and outside.
That also gets mixed up depending on phase and field position.Mellsblue wrote: ↑Sun Nov 12, 2023 9:13 pmHe is named 13 on the team sheet when paired with Hutchinson which may be the cause of confusion but, yeah, what you’ve said… plus I’ll be cruel and say he has to defend at 13 when playing with Hutchinson as Hutchinson is a liability there.Banquo wrote: ↑Sun Nov 12, 2023 8:08 pmNope. He’s played inside loads, including today. He and Hutchinson for example mix up in and out depending on move and phase. He was originally selected at 12 today with Freeman outside him, but Ramm was ill so Freeman went on the wing. But he still appeared at inside more often than not, as he did last season. When Proctor was in the centre, Fraser always played inside. He’s equally happy at inside and outside.
Nowhere near rigid enough, it’ll never catch on.Banquo wrote: ↑Sun Nov 12, 2023 9:21 pmThat also gets mixed up depending on phase and field position.Mellsblue wrote: ↑Sun Nov 12, 2023 9:13 pmHe is named 13 on the team sheet when paired with Hutchinson which may be the cause of confusion but, yeah, what you’ve said… plus I’ll be cruel and say he has to defend at 13 when playing with Hutchinson as Hutchinson is a liability there.Banquo wrote: ↑Sun Nov 12, 2023 8:08 pm
Nope. He’s played inside loads, including today. He and Hutchinson for example mix up in and out depending on move and phase. He was originally selected at 12 today with Freeman outside him, but Ramm was ill so Freeman went on the wing. But he still appeared at inside more often than not, as he did last season. When Proctor was in the centre, Fraser always played inside. He’s equally happy at inside and outside.
banned for 6 weeks, reduced to 3.
Weird offence - just sheer malcoordination of a kind that makes you think of 20 year old May, who couldn't always get his limbs sorted out. Hope Lawrence is only out for a week or so.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 4:15 pmbanned for 6 weeks, reduced to 3.
Lawrence (unsurprisingly) with a broken nose.
Might be a chance for Redpath & Ojomoh in the midfield
There's a post on shedweb basically saying that if things had happened differently, then the result would have been different, therefore no offence, and the TMO was right to not even look at it.
How are they enjoying their time-travelling holiday from 2015?Which Tyler wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 8:01 pmThere's a post on shedweb basically saying that if things had happened differently, then the result would have been different, therefore no offence, and the TMO was right to not even look at it.