Re: Wales vs England - Saturday 5.30pm
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2023 1:41 pm
If two-try Guy lives up to his name then England should coast home and give Stevie Blinder some real selection headaches over the weekend.
The RugbyRebels Messageboard
http://www.rugbyrebels.club/
He's a utility option so makes sense to try him in a few different positions, see if he's worth having in the 23 shirt. I imagine he'll be one of those dropped but interesting to see how he gets on. Gives hope we might see an actual centre at 12 although that does come with the negative of Farrell at 10.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 12:46 pmYep. Direct competition playing alongside eachother and has enough of a Barbarians vibe to make it feel basically pointless as a barometer of form. I mean is Porter at 12 a thing that's really worth spending time on?
It's hard to picture getting a good picture of what Willis can do in 25 minutes off the bench. Hopefully Borthwick has some sort of plan for making the most of game time in these warmups, but I'm far less interested in this game now.
It's all those extra sponsorship deals they landed after he became a part of the team. Huge draw on the commercial side of things clearly.
Totally. It’s not a position I’d stress for another makeshift square peg. Not with what’s in the squad.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 2:28 pm Yeah I just don't see what use his versatility is at the level he can offer.
Lawrence, Tuilagi and Slade have all played 12. Daly and Marchant can play centre and wing. Farrell can cover 12 if somehow that needs to happen. I just can't picture a situation where we're in such dire need of a wing/centre that we want to sacrifice someone better.
Obviously this ignores the fact that Borthwick rates him much higher than I do.
Ruck side looked far more interesting.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 12:46 pmYep. Direct competition playing alongside eachother and has enough of a Barbarians vibe to make it feel basically pointless as a barometer of form. I mean is Porter at 12 a thing that's really worth spending time on?
It's hard to picture getting a good picture of what Willis can do in 25 minutes off the bench. Hopefully Borthwick has some sort of plan for making the most of game time in these warmups, but I'm far less interested in this game now.
It did. I was really up for the match after seeing that lineup…Beasties wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 2:33 pmRuck side looked far more interesting.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 12:46 pmYep. Direct competition playing alongside eachother and has enough of a Barbarians vibe to make it feel basically pointless as a barometer of form. I mean is Porter at 12 a thing that's really worth spending time on?
It's hard to picture getting a good picture of what Willis can do in 25 minutes off the bench. Hopefully Borthwick has some sort of plan for making the most of game time in these warmups, but I'm far less interested in this game now.
Is he a square peg at 12? I'm not convinced he's an international centre but then our centre stocks are far from convincing. Slade didn't start a game at 12 last season and the season before that only for the five 6N games. Farrell we know is an issue and moving him to 12 is the least worst option of him starting but he isn't a good 12. Manu and Lawrence are the only options at 12 if we intend to play an actual 12 there and Manu is a sick note.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 2:32 pmTotally. It’s not a position I’d stress for another makeshift square peg. Not with what’s in the squad.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 2:28 pm Yeah I just don't see what use his versatility is at the level he can offer.
Lawrence, Tuilagi and Slade have all played 12. Daly and Marchant can play centre and wing. Farrell can cover 12 if somehow that needs to happen. I just can't picture a situation where we're in such dire need of a wing/centre that we want to sacrifice someone better.
Obviously this ignores the fact that Borthwick rates him much higher than I do.
Lawrence doesn't actually play 12 for anyone but England as well. Porter's probably got the most recent experience as a Premiership 12, after Manu.FKAS wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 4:14 pmIs he a square peg at 12? I'm not convinced he's an international centre but then our centre stocks are far from convincing. Slade didn't start a game at 12 last season and the season before that only for the five 6N games. Farrell we know is an issue and moving him to 12 is the least worst option of him starting but he isn't a good 12. Manu and Lawrence are the only options at 12 if we intend to play an actual 12 there and Manu is a sick note.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 2:32 pmTotally. It’s not a position I’d stress for another makeshift square peg. Not with what’s in the squad.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 2:28 pm Yeah I just don't see what use his versatility is at the level he can offer.
Lawrence, Tuilagi and Slade have all played 12. Daly and Marchant can play centre and wing. Farrell can cover 12 if somehow that needs to happen. I just can't picture a situation where we're in such dire need of a wing/centre that we want to sacrifice someone better.
Obviously this ignores the fact that Borthwick rates him much higher than I do.
I'm still expecting Porter to be released back to Tigers but his inclusion at 12 does suit his skill set and offers the backline some go forward.
I'd have liked Atkinson and Kelly to have at least had some time in training camp. At 21 and 22 they've got plenty of time on their side.fivepointer wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 4:36 pm SB missed a trick by not having a look at Atkinson or Kelly, hence the shoehorning of players into 12 that are more naturally suited to 13.
Its where we are. If Porter comes good, then he makes himself an option for the final squad.
Welcome to the 21st century England rugby teamfivepointer wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 4:36 pm SB missed a trick by not having a look at Atkinson or Kelly, hence the shoehorning of players into 12 that are more naturally suited to 13.
I'm really not sure either of them are ready for primetime yet. We're so keen to have a natural 12 that we see the best in everything they do and elide the bad moments.fivepointer wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 4:36 pm SB missed a trick by not having a look at Atkinson or Kelly, hence the shoehorning of players into 12 that are more naturally suited to 13.
Its where we are. If Porter comes good, then he makes himself an option for the final squad.
what's a natural 12, out of interest?Puja wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 11:13 pmI'm really not sure either of them are ready for primetime yet. We're so keen to have a natural 12 that we see the best in everything they do and elide the bad moments.fivepointer wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 4:36 pm SB missed a trick by not having a look at Atkinson or Kelly, hence the shoehorning of players into 12 that are more naturally suited to 13.
Its where we are. If Porter comes good, then he makes himself an option for the final squad.
Puja