Page 175 of 294

Re: Trump

Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2019 9:43 pm
by Mikey Brown
I really try not to pay attention to this stuff anymore but sometimes you can't help but laugh.


Re: Trump

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:28 pm
by Digby
Moving on from his confusion from using complex words like origin Trump announces his father was German, and unsurprisingly not only German but was born in a very great place in Germany. His father was born in New York

Re: Trump

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:39 pm
by Which Tyler
Digby wrote:Moving on from his confusion from using complex words like origin Trump announces his father was German, and unsurprisingly not only German but was born in a very great place in Germany. His father was born in New York
Maybe he got confused be wise his grandfather was German.
And grand is just another word for great, and everyone knows that Trump's father must have been great, he was related to Trump, of course.

Re: Trump

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:43 pm
by Digby
Which Tyler wrote:
Digby wrote:Moving on from his confusion from using complex words like origin Trump announces his father was German, and unsurprisingly not only German but was born in a very great place in Germany. His father was born in New York
Maybe he got confused be wise his grandfather was German.
And grand is just another word for great, and everyone knows that Trump's father must have been great, he was related to Trump, of course.
It's possible he spouts all this nonsense on purpose so the press cover his gaffs not his policies

Re: Trump

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 2:57 pm
by gransoporro
Are we going to comment on the whole "windmill noise causes cancer" thing?

Morepork might be under sedatives after reading that one.

Re: Trump

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 5:03 pm
by Stones of granite
Which Tyler wrote:
Digby wrote:Moving on from his confusion from using complex words like origin Trump announces his father was German, and unsurprisingly not only German but was born in a very great place in Germany. His father was born in New York
Maybe he got confused be wise his grandfather was German.
And grand is just another word for great, and everyone knows that Trump's father must have been great, he was related to Trump, of course.
He's been watching The Man in the High Castle and got a bit confused about New York being the Capital of the Greater Nazi Reich.

Re: Trump

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 5:13 pm
by morepork
gransoporro wrote:Are we going to comment on the whole "windmill noise causes cancer" thing?

Morepork might be under sedatives after reading that one.
Verbatim:

If you have a windmill anywhere near your house, congratulations, your house just went down 75 percent in value,” Trump said. “And they say the noise causes cancer. You tell me that one, okay? Rerrrr rerrrr!”

Re: Trump

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 5:16 pm
by gransoporro
morepork wrote:
gransoporro wrote:Are we going to comment on the whole "windmill noise causes cancer" thing?

Morepork might be under sedatives after reading that one.
Verbatim:

If you have a windmill anywhere near your house, congratulations, your house just went down 75 percent in value,” Trump said. “And they say the noise causes cancer. You tell me that one, okay? Rerrrr rerrrr!”
And how do you feel about it?

Keep in mind that I have the Berlusconi vaccination, so I am not that shocked as I used to be 2-3 decades ago. I just laugh these days...

Re: Trump

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 6:47 pm
by Mikey Brown
gransoporro wrote:
morepork wrote:
gransoporro wrote:Are we going to comment on the whole "windmill noise causes cancer" thing?

Morepork might be under sedatives after reading that one.
Verbatim:

If you have a windmill anywhere near your house, congratulations, your house just went down 75 percent in value,” Trump said. “And they say the noise causes cancer. You tell me that one, okay? Rerrrr rerrrr!”
And how do you feel about it?

Keep in mind that I have the Berlusconi vaccination, so I am not that shocked as I used to be 2-3 decades ago. I just laugh these days...
Yeah I’ve been told this is exactly what your lot lived through with Burlusconi. It’s just so difficult to imagine a man like that (knowingly) putting this distraction strategy to use.

Re: Trump

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 6:59 pm
by morepork
I'm not shocked. It is amusing to watch him struggle to find words for concepts he has no understanding of, all the while sweating on being busted as a pig ignorant fat sweaty thick cunt. My beef is with the social media nightmare that made it possible for as cretinous an individual as he to be considered in any way shape or form fit for public office. We are in the middle of a social devolution and he is the orange face of it. Make shit up. Counter with conspiracy. Deny facts. Pass responsibility elsewhere. REPEAT.

Re: Trump

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 7:09 pm
by gransoporro
Mikey Brown wrote:
gransoporro wrote:
morepork wrote:
Verbatim:

If you have a windmill anywhere near your house, congratulations, your house just went down 75 percent in value,” Trump said. “And they say the noise causes cancer. You tell me that one, okay? Rerrrr rerrrr!”
And how do you feel about it?

Keep in mind that I have the Berlusconi vaccination, so I am not that shocked as I used to be 2-3 decades ago. I just laugh these days...
Yeah I’ve been told this is exactly what your lot lived through with Burlusconi. It’s just so difficult to imagine a man like that (knowingly) putting this distraction strategy to use.
I don't think it is a distraction strategy. It works like that, but the guy is really like this. No mysterious additional depths.

Re: Trump

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 10:01 pm
by Digby
It's just possible windmills create enough noise they might disturb sleep, and it does seem sleep isn't something many take seriously enough across a range of health issues. And if he wants to address health concerns arising from power generation that's great. Still, coal!

Re: Trump

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 10:51 pm
by WaspInWales
Digby wrote:
Which Tyler wrote:
Digby wrote:Moving on from his confusion from using complex words like origin Trump announces his father was German, and unsurprisingly not only German but was born in a very great place in Germany. His father was born in New York
Maybe he got confused be wise his grandfather was German.
And grand is just another word for great, and everyone knows that Trump's father must have been great, he was related to Trump, of course.
It's possible he spouts all this nonsense on purpose so the press cover his gaffs not his policies
No chance. He really is as thick as he comes across.

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2019 3:29 am
by morepork
WaspInWales wrote:
Digby wrote:
Which Tyler wrote: Maybe he got confused be wise his grandfather was German.
And grand is just another word for great, and everyone knows that Trump's father must have been great, he was related to Trump, of course.
It's possible he spouts all this nonsense on purpose so the press cover his gaffs not his policies
No chance. He really is as thick as he comes across.

Word.

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2019 10:57 am
by Eliashberg
Slightly outdated now, but I thought this was an excellent article:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/25/opin ... e=Homepage

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2019 11:45 am
by Puja
Eliashberg wrote:Slightly outdated now, but I thought this was an excellent article:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/25/opin ... e=Homepage
I agree with all of that. No point just ignoring what led to his success and saying he's a fluke, cause that's what'll see him win another term in 2020.

Puja

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2019 11:52 am
by Digby
I don't really see how Trump can win in 2020. He lost the popular vote last time around and has worked hard to alienate some of the groups who voted for him.

Then again I confidently asserted nobody would be stupid enough to make him their nominee and certainly nobody would be stupid enough to make him president. And there's still little identified as to what the Dems will stand on other than not being Trump. Also Trump might just be getting started on the politics of fear, who knows where this ends up if a mob mentality takes over

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2019 11:55 am
by Eliashberg
Puja wrote:
Eliashberg wrote:Slightly outdated now, but I thought this was an excellent article:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/25/opin ... e=Homepage
I agree with all of that. No point just ignoring what led to his success and saying he's a fluke, cause that's what'll see him win another term in 2020.

Puja
The Democrats will hopefully take some responsiblity for their failure in 2016 and provide more room for progressive candidates. Taking responsibility is a hard thing for Americans though, hence the Adderall.

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2019 12:22 pm
by Eliashberg
Digby wrote:I don't really see how Trump can win in 2020. He lost the popular vote last time around and has worked hard to alienate some of the groups who voted for him.
I'm not so sure. The 2016 election was more the result of Democrats screwing it up rather than Trump winning it, although he would disagree with that.

Clinton isn't just hated with the inbred rednecks; her shady role in international arms trade, and her earnings through series of speeches at Goldman Sachs and frankly, yet much more questionable environments, haven't made her much beloved among progressives in the USA. Naomi Klein wrote a gem of an article just after Trump was elected:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ricas-fate

The candidate coming from the Democrats will be better this time round, so that gives hope. But the whole Mueller probe has severely dented public trust in mainstream political media (NYT, WP, Wall Street Journal etc.) what with them superficially and brainlessly hyping the whole thing. Probed by a refusal to accept that Trump is a result of deeper problems, rather than the cause, of course. Trump will milk this, and rumors are that he wants to join the Correspondents Dinner this year. People are already composing the predictable jokes he'll make , like "sorry I wasn't there for the past two years, but I was too busy plotting with Vladimir Putin in your imaginations".

A combination of him milking this little victory on the Mueller probe, and another Wall Street candidate from the Democrats could win it again for Trump.

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2019 3:01 pm
by Digby
I've never gotten the impression voters who typically vote Democratic hate Clinton, more she's just not appealing to huge numbers. She certainly turned out to be a much weaker candidate than I'd expected

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2019 4:19 pm
by Eliashberg
Digby wrote:I've never gotten the impression voters who typically vote Democratic hate Clinton, more she's just not appealing to huge numbers. She certainly turned out to be a much weaker candidate than I'd expected
Hm. Well there is a bit of a schism among the Democrats for a while now. It became very apparent in the recent primary election results for NY state, between Andrew Cuomo and Cynthia Nixon. Cuomo won, and most importantly, in NYC. But he lost in Tompkins County, where a large part of the electorate sits at Cornell University (even though the Nixon campaign misspelled 'Ithaca'). He was unpopular from the very moment Clinton endorsed him.

Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2019 10:46 am
by Digby
Eliashberg wrote:
Digby wrote:I've never gotten the impression voters who typically vote Democratic hate Clinton, more she's just not appealing to huge numbers. She certainly turned out to be a much weaker candidate than I'd expected
Hm. Well there is a bit of a schism among the Democrats for a while now. It became very apparent in the recent primary election results for NY state, between Andrew Cuomo and Cynthia Nixon. Cuomo won, and most importantly, in NYC. But he lost in Tompkins County, where a large part of the electorate sits at Cornell University (even though the Nixon campaign misspelled 'Ithaca'). He was unpopular from the very moment Clinton endorsed him.
Well of course people in a party disagree on who should be leading it, that's always the case. Perhaps even unpopular is too strong a term, but I'd be much closer to agreeing with that rather than hate

Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2019 3:57 pm
by Eliashberg
Digby wrote:
Eliashberg wrote:
Digby wrote:I've never gotten the impression voters who typically vote Democratic hate Clinton, more she's just not appealing to huge numbers. She certainly turned out to be a much weaker candidate than I'd expected
Hm. Well there is a bit of a schism among the Democrats for a while now. It became very apparent in the recent primary election results for NY state, between Andrew Cuomo and Cynthia Nixon. Cuomo won, and most importantly, in NYC. But he lost in Tompkins County, where a large part of the electorate sits at Cornell University (even though the Nixon campaign misspelled 'Ithaca'). He was unpopular from the very moment Clinton endorsed him.
Well of course people in a party disagree on who should be leading it, that's always the case. Perhaps even unpopular is too strong a term, but I'd be much closer to agreeing with that rather than hate
Indeed, Cuomo was unpopular, not hated. But Hillary, photoshopping her face on a Nazi costume and handing out the flyers at local Democrat conventions? That's pretty close to hate for me, though. The whole "Bernie or Bust" thing went generally too far. There were a lot of morons that voted for him against Hillary, and then for Trump as a protest vote. The split in the party is still there, though, and its a topic of daily discussion.

Re: Trump

Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:08 am
by morepork
I am sick and tired of this racist cunt.

Re: Trump

Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:25 pm
by Digby
Sage advice from Donny that Boeing should fix the plane that keeps flying into the ground, no chance Boeing think of that for themselves. Also great advice to add some great new features, though in this he's sadly not specific, cheeseburger holders alongside drink holders maybe?

Finally bless him for inviting commentary on what he knows, one suspects he'll be getting a lot of updates as to what the world thinks he knows