Page 172 of 294
Re: Trump
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 4:58 pm
by Digby
And if you're voting for an actual nazi any label of far right is synonymous with stupid
Re: Trump
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:12 pm
by morepork
I'm well aware that the fat cunt represents some sick people in the voting populace, but he is manifestly incompetent, more so than even someone like that idiot Berlusconi. He is being driven by rich white men that transfer the blame for inequality to people that aren't in their white man rich club and fuckheads swallow it. Trump is not fully cognisant of this, no matter how people try to spin it. The real emergency is that the executive branch of government can be hijacked so easily by these people that a special needs case like Trump can actually exist in the space. It's fucking broken.
Re: Trump
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:16 pm
by gransoporro
Digby wrote:And if you're voting for an actual nazi any label of far right is synonymous with stupid
If spomeone is an actual nazi, and they vote for a nazi, they are coherent, not stupid.
Re: Trump
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:23 pm
by gransoporro
morepork wrote:I'm well aware that the fat cunt represents some sick people in the voting populace, but he is manifestly incompetent, more so than even someone like that idiot Berlusconi. He is being driven by rich white men that transfer the blame for inequality to people that aren't in their white man rich club and fuckheads swallow it. Trump is not fully cognisant of this, no matter how people try to spin it. The real emergency is that the executive branch of government can be hijacked so easily by these people that a special needs case like Trump can actually exist in the space. It's fucking broken.
Just like B, T does marketing and branding - what made them rich - applied to politics. He knows what his base wants. He has 0 ideology and no moral compass, so you can see him freely float from one position to another. If he actually cared about something, he would either be cognissant or find someone that is.
The hijacking is real, but rather than a pro move it is an amateur one. Then you will see the checks and balances come into play from all different and strange directions.
Did anyone notice how Justice Roberts, of the longstanding conservative positions, is now a full swing vote in the SCOTUS?
Re: Trump
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 6:30 pm
by morepork
Trump got rich by being handed 20 000 properties in Manhattan. Any foray outside of that has failed. He is so stupid it’s pathological. The checks and balances are so superficial that they can be undermined by Facebook. That is a broke dick.
Re: Trump
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 9:33 pm
by Digby
gransoporro wrote:Digby wrote:And if you're voting for an actual nazi any label of far right is synonymous with stupid
If spomeone is an actual nazi, and they vote for a nazi, they are coherent, not stupid.
I'd accept insane rather than stupid, but not coherent
Re: Trump
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 9:52 pm
by gransoporro
Digby wrote:gransoporro wrote:Digby wrote:And if you're voting for an actual nazi any label of far right is synonymous with stupid
If spomeone is an actual nazi, and they vote for a nazi, they are coherent, not stupid.
I'd accept insane rather than stupid, but not coherent
Your moral compass puts you outside the discussion. Actual nazis do exist here, and lots of people share partial views with them: they would not support a genocide, but would not recognize others the same rights they think they are entitled to, and think that nationalism is a very good thing.
They would keep it under a lid until November 2016. They are much bolder these days, and they may be people you know.
*They may even come in your face and taunt you for, I don't know, saying that transgenders are human beings, have the same rights of everyone else, and shouldn't be targeted for who they are.
*: the above episode may or may not have happened to me.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 12:28 am
by WaspInWales
Fucking hell.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 12:29 am
by WaspInWales
Everything is being normalised under this administration.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 6:32 am
by Digby
Another shooting, another chance not to declare a national emergency
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 10:33 am
by Digby
'I am declaring a national emergency... I didn’t have to do this.'
From his own press conference suggesting even he doesn't buy there's an emergency, though again we have to consider he's as coherent as a badger with syphilis
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 10:37 am
by WaspInWales
It's the signing of the bill and declaring an emergency that pretty much violates the bill that makes me laugh.
What a fucking moron.
He was particularly childlike during his press conference too. He just cannot cope with criticism and unless everyone is heaping praise on him, he'll do it himself.
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 1:35 pm
by morepork
I just watched it. Sweet mother of fuck. If you home schooled a product of several generations of consanguineous relationships using nothing but lego, unedited tabloid newspapers, and a space program primate that had miraculously survived orbiting the Sun and crash landing in the Khazakhstani desert for a teacher, that child would still present a more cogent argument than that on display by the President yesterday.
"I get my numbers from a lot of sources, like Homeland Security, primarily. And the numbers that I have from Homeland Security are a disaster. And you know what else is a disaster? The numbers that come out of Homeland Security, Kirstjen, for the cost that we spend and the money that we lose because of illegal immigration. Billions and billions of dollars a month. Billions and billions of dollars and it’s unnecessary. . . . I use many stats . . . you have stats far worse than the ones I use, but I use many stats. But I also use Homeland Security."
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 4:09 pm
by Digby
You're being misled by a media that’s RIGGED AND CORRUPT
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 5:53 pm
by morepork
Please make it stop.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2019 9:02 am
by Digby
So the fat one doesn't like memorandums of understanding, others may care to posit he doesn't understand them, but luckily crisis averted now they've decided to call the exact same thing an agreement in the China trade talks.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:33 pm
by morepork
It appears to be frighteningly easy to leverage conspiracy theory to counter scientific fact and engineer unfettered, dangerously dysregulated access to what you want at the expense of everything else. An adult with a functioning brain is needed to counter these raging thundercunts.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... 4ce7eb76ca
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 10:12 pm
by gransoporro
morepork wrote:It appears to be frighteningly easy to leverage conspiracy theory to counter scientific fact and engineer unfettered, dangerously dysregulated access to what you want at the expense of everything else. An adult with a functioning brain is needed to counter these raging thundercunts.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... 4ce7eb76ca
Not one adult, several thousands. And strategically located in swing states.
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 10:38 pm
by paddy no 11
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2019 10:12 am
by Digby
The comments from Trump on abortion fall firmly into the realm of disgusting lies, the policy is weird as in and of itself it likely ensures electoral defeat
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2019 11:17 am
by Stom
2 small things about that article, specifically about Soros and the Hungarian political situation.
1) While the propaganda against Soros is disgusting and over-the-top, there is no denying his involvement in...political organisations masquerading as NGOs. A lot of what he had been doing around "democracy" in Eastern Europe PRIOR to Orban was questionable in motive at best. So he was a very, very easy target. Because he'd already been doing things that could be considered against many countries and governments, even if those countries/governments were trying to do the correct things.
2) Hungary was called an economic basket case in the article but it is also a political one. The PM before Orban was a man called Gyurcsany, who pretty much admitted to lying to the people. Which was a problem in and of itself, and explains Orban's original win. However, Gyurcsany did not then leave politics. That kind of politician in the UK would at the least retreat to the backbenches, but not in Hungary.
First, he led the socialist party into that first election, which he inevitably lost. Then he was kicked out, so he formed a new party and split the vote (because for some unknown reason 10s of thousands of people are still willing to vote for a known liar). But it gets worse...The socialist party then elected another member of the old guard as their leader, who didn't get on with anyone in the party, which meant the party split in two again. So now there are 3 socialist parties (MSZP (Socialists), DK (Gyurcsany), Egyutt (the new split).
Would you ever have thought that might split the vote further? But it gets worse...
These 3 parties consistently fail to come up with anything that could make them electable. Meanwhile, a liberal socialist alternative (LMP), sprung up who actually had some good policies, but with no finance have not had the means to win more than 5 seats (currently 6), not helped by gerrymandering.
So, while the anti-migrant rhetoric is ramped up, people are given a choice between the party for the Hungarian people (Fidesz), the Neo-Nazis (Jobbik), 3 basket cases, and a party they see as not having the funds to get elected. And then the kids arrive with their own party, Momentum, who want to muscle in on the act but only succeed in alienating more people and take attention away from politicians who could make a difference.
So there we have it.
If you were to pick an individual in European politics to back 10 years ago, you would have picked Orban every single day. Even without these repugnant people, he would have been in power all this time.
I think they're just very good at picking winners.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2019 1:27 pm
by Digby
I for one am shocked Trump isn't saddened by the actions of Bob Kraft of the New England Patriots, and is saddened instead by the fact his friend was arrested. Who knew Trump would think there was no need for corrective actions when a white billionaire was accused of sex crimes
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2019 2:05 pm
by paddy no 11
Stom wrote:
2 small things about that article, specifically about Soros and the Hungarian political situation.
1) While the propaganda against Soros is disgusting and over-the-top, there is no denying his involvement in...political organisations masquerading as NGOs. A lot of what he had been doing around "democracy" in Eastern Europe PRIOR to Orban was questionable in motive at best. So he was a very, very easy target. Because he'd already been doing things that could be considered against many countries and governments, even if those countries/governments were trying to do the correct things.
2) Hungary was called an economic basket case in the article but it is also a political one. The PM before Orban was a man called Gyurcsany, who pretty much admitted to lying to the people. Which was a problem in and of itself, and explains Orban's original win. However, Gyurcsany did not then leave politics. That kind of politician in the UK would at the least retreat to the backbenches, but not in Hungary.
First, he led the socialist party into that first election, which he inevitably lost. Then he was kicked out, so he formed a new party and split the vote (because for some unknown reason 10s of thousands of people are still willing to vote for a known liar). But it gets worse...The socialist party then elected another member of the old guard as their leader, who didn't get on with anyone in the party, which meant the party split in two again. So now there are 3 socialist parties (MSZP (Socialists), DK (Gyurcsany), Egyutt (the new split).
Would you ever have thought that might split the vote further? But it gets worse...
These 3 parties consistently fail to come up with anything that could make them electable. Meanwhile, a liberal socialist alternative (LMP), sprung up who actually had some good policies, but with no finance have not had the means to win more than 5 seats (currently 6), not helped by gerrymandering.
So, while the anti-migrant rhetoric is ramped up, people are given a choice between the party for the Hungarian people (Fidesz), the Neo-Nazis (Jobbik), 3 basket cases, and a party they see as not having the funds to get elected. And then the kids arrive with their own party, Momentum, who want to muscle in on the act but only succeed in alienating more people and take attention away from politicians who could make a difference.
So there we have it.
If you were to pick an individual in European politics to back 10 years ago, you would have picked Orban every single day. Even without these repugnant people, he would have been in power all this time.
I think they're just very good at picking winners.
Thanks for the knowledge on Hungary
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2019 2:13 pm
by morepork
What a surprise. These rich white 1-percenters get away with repugnant sexual abuse with monotonous regularity. Check out Jeff Epstein for the poster boy example. Now they have a pliant semi literate fucktard in charge of things and they aren't even trying any more. Good old NFL. Abuse women, no problem. Take one public stand against racist police brutality, and it's straight to hell. Fuck I hope people wake up to this.
Re: Trump
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2019 1:45 pm
by Digby
Following reports of Michael Cohen saying the president is a lying, racist, conman, Trump says 'he did bad things unrelated to Trump'
Luckily you never look crazy when you talk about yourself in such fashion, and you can take that to the bank says Diggers