Page 168 of 294
Re: Trump
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:18 pm
by Digby
morepork wrote:Digby wrote:Iran has done nothing is a rather odd line
To justify an invasion?
I'd say they've done plenty to warrant that. The problem is the chaos that ensue and what would emerge as a leadership or groups contesting power, we've seen in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya that you simply can't decide they should have a nice functioning democracy, and it's likely far better to negotiate with what's in place than seek military change.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 9:05 am
by Stones of granite
Digby wrote:morepork wrote:Digby wrote:Iran has done nothing is a rather odd line
To justify an invasion?
I'd say they've done plenty to warrant that. The problem is the chaos that ensue and what would emerge as a leadership or groups contesting power, we've seen in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya that you simply can't decide they should have a nice functioning democracy, and it's likely far better to negotiate with what's in place than seek military change.
Apart from anything else, I think that a realistic assessment would come to the conclusion that an invasion of Iran by the US would be extremely difficult to carry off. In some peoples minds it might look like Iran and Iraq are similar equating to a similar result, but they are not. A combination of geography, a million man mobilisation potential, and a sophisticated domestic arms industry in Iran makes them a different proposition altogether.
Not that I am not suggesting that I would consider it justified in the first place, just that 2019 Iran is a completely different kettle of fish to 2003 Iraq.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 1:03 pm
by morepork
Yeah, lets have some blue sky thinking around invading a sovereign state. Any group of people that consider 300 burgers and assorted luke warm congealed fast foods by candle light in the seat of their democracy is disqualified from authority. On anything. The most 'Murrican thing eva?
Screen Shot 2019-01-15 at 8.04.27 AM.png
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/15/us/p ... -food.html
As is tradition, President Trump hosted the champions of college football, the Clemson Tigers, for a celebration of their athletic achievement at the White House on Monday.
The food he offered them was far less traditional.
Piles of burgers and fish sandwiches from McDonald’s, Wendy’s and Burger King, still in their boxes and wrappers, were served on trays in the candlelit dining room. Tubs of dipping sauces were stacked in silver gravy boats. On another table, heat lamps kept French fries and Domino’s pizzas warm. Salads were available, too.
Class is permanent.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 1:20 pm
by Stones of granite
morepork wrote:Yeah, lets have some blue sky thinking around invading a sovereign state. Any group of people that consider 300 burgers and assorted luke warm congealed fast foods by candle light in the seat of their democracy is disqualified from authority. On anything. The most 'Murrican thing eva?
Screen Shot 2019-01-15 at 8.04.27 AM.png
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/15/us/p ... -food.html
As is tradition, President Trump hosted the champions of college football, the Clemson Tigers, for a celebration of their athletic achievement at the White House on Monday.
The food he offered them was far less traditional.
Piles of burgers and fish sandwiches from McDonald’s, Wendy’s and Burger King, still in their boxes and wrappers, were served on trays in the candlelit dining room. Tubs of dipping sauces were stacked in silver gravy boats. On another table, heat lamps kept French fries and Domino’s pizzas warm. Salads were available, too.
Class is permanent.
I'm near retching thinking what that lot smelled like.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 1:44 pm
by WaspInWales
Is it really a surprise?
Trump is well known to like fast-food (yes, really), and he probably thought this was the perfect way to bond with common folk.
How they kept the food warm for long enough is beyond me.
Congrats to the Clemson Tigers though...bet they won't bother trying to win next season though

Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 2:50 pm
by Puja
I can absolutely see Trump trying to start this as a new tradition. It basically sums up his presidency - "Come have a meal in the White House - the President is Trump and the food is McDonalds and we're looking at replacing the White House with a prefab."
Puja
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 2:54 pm
by morepork
Puja wrote:I can absolutely see Trump trying to start this as a new tradition. It basically sums up his presidency - "Come have a meal in the White House - the President is Trump and the food is McDonalds and we're looking at replacing the White House with a prefab."
Puja
With gold wallpaper and every room dominated by a yuuge TV and erotic art in expensive frames.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 2:57 pm
by morepork
The hamberders went down a treat.
Screen Shot 2019-01-15 at 10.01.46 AM.png
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 3:25 pm
by Digby
Are hamberders a thing?
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 3:33 pm
by Digby
Actually, how many people on a football team? I don't even know how many players are on the field for a game of American Footie, and still less idea how much depth would be considered normal
But more than a thousand burgers is a hell of a claim. How many could a normal person eat with all that fat, sugar and salt before they'd simply retch?
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 3:52 pm
by Stones of granite
Digby wrote:Actually, how many people on a football team? I don't even know how many players are on the field for a game of American Footie, and still less idea how much depth would be considered normal
But more than a thousand burgers is a hell of a claim. How many could a normal person eat with all that fat, sugar and salt before they'd simply retch?
According to their webpage, they have a roster of 99 players and 11 coaches. Still, 1000 "hamberders" seems a lot.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 3:54 pm
by WaspInWales
Stones of granite wrote:Digby wrote:Actually, how many people on a football team? I don't even know how many players are on the field for a game of American Footie, and still less idea how much depth would be considered normal
But more than a thousand burgers is a hell of a claim. How many could a normal person eat with all that fat, sugar and salt before they'd simply retch?
According to their webpage, they have a roster of 99 players and 11 coaches. Still, 1000 "hamberders" seems a lot.
Maybe he was talking about total number of patties...Big Mac has two, double cheeseburgers??
I dunno. Fat bastards.
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 4:48 pm
by Puja
Stones of granite wrote:Digby wrote:Actually, how many people on a football team? I don't even know how many players are on the field for a game of American Footie, and still less idea how much depth would be considered normal
But more than a thousand burgers is a hell of a claim. How many could a normal person eat with all that fat, sugar and salt before they'd simply retch?
According to their webpage, they have a roster of 99 players and 11 coaches. Still, 1000 "hamberders" seems a lot.
This is Trump we're talking about. 300 burgers gets expanded to 500 the first time he talked to someone about it, 700 within a few retellings, 900 within an hour, and by the end of the evening, it's "over a thousand".
Give it a day or two and it'll be, "The most burgers ever ordered by anyone ever. Really big burgers too - they wanted to give me the thin ones, but I insisted, I told them you know we want the biggest, best American burgers. It's true, it's true. Over five thousand and they ate them all. Loved them. Better than having fancy food like the Democrats wanted. Proper American food for proper Americans. It's true. They were happy to do it for the security if our country."
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 5:30 pm
by morepork
A smocking good time! A WALL of hamberders packaged in cardboard fashioned from a nambian forrest that under our great american heat lamps became the soggiest wettest meal of all time, from the perspective of water. COFEVE!!!! WINNING!!!
Re: Trump
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 5:33 pm
by Digby
Puja wrote:Stones of granite wrote:Digby wrote:Actually, how many people on a football team? I don't even know how many players are on the field for a game of American Footie, and still less idea how much depth would be considered normal
But more than a thousand burgers is a hell of a claim. How many could a normal person eat with all that fat, sugar and salt before they'd simply retch?
According to their webpage, they have a roster of 99 players and 11 coaches. Still, 1000 "hamberders" seems a lot.
This is Trump we're talking about. 300 burgers gets expanded to 500 the first time he talked to someone about it, 700 within a few retellings, 900 within an hour, and by the end of the evening, it's "over a thousand".
Give it a day or two and it'll be, "The most burgers ever ordered by anyone ever. Really big burgers too - they wanted to give me the thin ones, but I insisted, I told them you know we want the biggest, best American burgers. It's true, it's true. Over five thousand and they ate them all. Loved them. Better than having fancy food like the Democrats wanted. Proper American food for proper Americans. It's true. They were happy to do it for the security if our country."
Par for the course if he's just bullshitting about the number. Otherwise 10 each in an hour is some going.
It's been a while since I ate at McDonald's, I think I've had one sausage and egg mcmuffin this century, but aged 16 I'd have happily eaten two quarter pounders with fries and a milkshake, I probably could have put down 4 , but even as a hungry young adult 5 and above seems unlikely, maybe if stoned it'd be easier
Re: Trump
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2019 5:11 pm
by Digby
Is Rudy the worst lawyer ever including Eugene?
Or is this a damage limitation strategy that he keeps admitting to his client's guilt as they know the jig is up?
Re: Trump
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2019 5:53 pm
by WaspInWales
Digby wrote:Is Rudy the worst lawyer ever including Eugene?
Or is this a damage limitation strategy that he keeps admitting to his client's guilt as they know the jig is up?
Love Rudy...what a complete mong he is. Every time the idiot opens his mouth, he somehow makes things worse for the self-proclaimed genius who hired him.
Trump is a retard, but I honestly can't decide whether Rudy is above, or below him on that scale.
Re: Trump
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2019 5:55 pm
by WaspInWales
Re: Trump
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2019 5:58 pm
by morepork
He is surrounded by complete helmets.
Re: Trump
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2019 7:58 pm
by morepork
That is sadder than a Bill English pizza.
Re: Trump
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2019 5:44 am
by Digby
Well, it's at least an opening in trying to make a deal, not a very good offer and he shouldn't need a shutdown to progress talks, but it's a first step
Re: Trump
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 6:19 am
by Digby
Do we now send our envoys to speak to President Clinton if we're just going to recognise who we want?
Re: Trump
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 7:43 am
by zer0
Surely you could just refuse to recognise any colonial president and instead go straight to old Lizzy II?
Re: Trump
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 8:26 am
by Digby
She's busy covering up her husband's feck ups
Re: Trump
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 9:48 am
by Mellsblue
Where Trump leads everyone else will follow, even the Canadians.