Cricket fred

Post Reply
User avatar
canta_brian
Posts: 1262
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:52 pm

Re: RE: Re: Cicket fred

Post by canta_brian »

oldbackrow wrote:
canta_brian wrote:Seen both ugly sides of the Australian sporting psyche in the last week. On Saturday we saw the saw loser whingeing about perceived wrongs. Today the over confident bully boy. Neither does them any credit.
In some ways the Cheika stuff is a bit 'meh', especially with the faces Johnson used to pull, Gatland and Hansens spats and EJ's swearing but perhaps MC needs a bit of a word in the ear!

I do find Lyons "ending players careers" talk very unsavoury and OTT though. Have some digs, give it big and talk about outplaying them but I think hes gone a bit too far!
Give lynn credit. He does have a bowling average of 31.83. ;)
User avatar
oldbackrow
Posts: 281
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:46 pm
Location: Darkest Rotherham
Contact:

Re: Cicket fred

Post by oldbackrow »

Isn't that the same bowling average that Cheika has?! ;)
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14569
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Mellsblue »

I’ve set up a RR league in superbru. Put your credibility where your mouth is:

https://www.superbru.com/ashes/pool.php?p=11768569

Pool name: Rugby Rebels

Pool code: zipsrocs
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14569
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Mellsblue »

oldbackrow wrote:
canta_brian wrote:Seen both ugly sides of the Australian sporting psyche in the last week. On Saturday we saw the saw loser whingeing about perceived wrongs. Today the over confident bully boy. Neither does them any credit.
In some ways the Cheika stuff is a bit 'meh', especially with the faces Johnson used to pull, Gatland and Hansens spats and EJ's swearing but perhaps MC needs a bit of a word in the ear!
I more annoyed by the chav who though hurling some abuse Cheika’s way was acceptable. If you go to watch a match ast HQ then you mind your Ps and Qs. If you can’t behave like an adult then go and watch a different sport at a different venue.
User avatar
oldbackrow
Posts: 281
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:46 pm
Location: Darkest Rotherham
Contact:

Re: Cicket fred

Post by oldbackrow »

Mellsblue wrote: I more annoyed by the chav who though hurling some abuse Cheika’s way was acceptable. If you go to watch a match ast HQ then you mind your Ps and Qs. If you can’t behave like an adult then go and watch a different sport at a different venue.
Do we know what was said?

If it was indeed abuse, then there should be action taken. I agree with you that the stadium is a place of work for players and coaches and they shouldn't be subjected to any abuse, whether provoked or not!
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14569
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Mellsblue »

oldbackrow wrote:
Mellsblue wrote: I more annoyed by the chav who though hurling some abuse Cheika’s way was acceptable. If you go to watch a match ast HQ then you mind your Ps and Qs. If you can’t behave like an adult then go and watch a different sport at a different venue.
Do we know what was said?

If it was indeed abuse, then there should be action taken. I agree with you that the stadium is a place of work for players and coaches and they shouldn't be subjected to any abuse, whether provoked or not!
Unless it was something along the lines of “Jolly nice to meet you, old chap. You seem in somewhat of a tizzy, could I organise for a pot of Earl Grey to be sent to your seat?” then it’s unacceptable.
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by WaspInWales »

Initial optimism fading somewhat
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by WaspInWales »

Don't want to tempt fate, but optimism rising.

Time for bed...

Cue collapse.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14569
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Mellsblue »

I think we’d all have taken 196-4 at stumps on day 1. The newbies look good and if Cook and Root can find form we’ll be fine. Those two knowing that not all hope rests on them might help their form.
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by WaspInWales »

All in all, pretty pleased with that. Losing Root was a shame, but a double century in the second innings will make up for it.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
fivepointer
Posts: 5902
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by fivepointer »

Honours even. Things nicely poised for 2nd day. Stoneman and Vince getting runs is a really important for our chances in this game and the series.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14569
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Mellsblue »

Just finished watching the highlights. Vince looked very polished, as does Malan. Stoneman looked very solid. Sometimes a scorecard can be deceiving if the team in the field had a mare but that wasn’t really the case here, aside from dropping Vince off Lyon.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Digby »

Aussies have the edge given we scored so slowly, and we now need to start again Vs another new ball. The pitch though was slow for the Gabba, and we had players understandably very keen no to throw their wickets away, and our two established players managed bugger all between them so rather than 80 short

Tomorrow looks the best day for batting with the sun having a chance to speed up the ball coming onto the bat and the outfield, after that there could be some rain.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5842
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Stom »

I think it's a good start, but we need to turn it into something a bit more. We need these two to stick around a little, and then build partnerships throughout Ali, Bairstow, Woakes. If we have 350+ before getting to the tail, I'll be happy.

And I hardly think we scored that slowly...The start was slow going, but after over 30 the pace really picked up for a while. And as Ali and Bairstow will both be looking to score quickly, I think we well on target speed wise. We are slightly behind on the runs, though, I feel, but not by much.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Digby »

So we're slightly behind on runs but didn't score slowly?

I'm not taking a swipe at the slow scoring, with that many players unsure of their role/place and with it being an opening day of an ashes series I'd take it over a collapse, so I'm accepting of why it happened. But in reality we only scored at 2.5 runs per over, which is a behind where we'd want to be, and means 2 more wickets would put us under big pressure. And wickets are likely with the new ball based merely on the history of test cricket.
Banquo
Posts: 19184
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Banquo »

aussies seem like a right bunch of to55ers
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by WaspInWales »

Hmmm
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by WaspInWales »

Two quick wickets and two fresh batsmen at the crease.

Seemed to be in a relative amount of control and now we're in a bit of shit.

Need Bairstow and Woakes to do something special now or we could be out for 275 ish.
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by WaspInWales »

And another.

250-7. Looking ok at close last night and we're up against it now.

Still, decent conditions for our bowlers too.
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by WaspInWales »

If we make it to lunch. That's a victory in itself.

Just need Broad and Anderson to put another 150 runs on the board and we're sorted.

In other news, what kind of journalism is this from the Beeb:
I thought Warner had a stiff neck? He must be on decent painkillers. He took that catch like a dog leaping for a frisbee.
?
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by WaspInWales »

So, 302 all out.

So, so but that collapse is showing no signs of leaving England. Really could've done with Bairstow scoring. More cheap wickets.

What's the odds on Jimmy injuring himself during lunch?
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by WaspInWales »

Boom!
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14569
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Mellsblue »

Warner gone. Big wicket.
Banquo
Posts: 19184
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Banquo »

Woakes ineffectual and relatively expensive, Ball expensive. Not backing up the main bowlers, and Moeen rusty.
User avatar
Parsifal
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:30 pm
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Parsifal »

Banquo wrote:aussies seem like a right bunch of to55ers
Seem like? Exhibit A is Warner who is an absolute bell end on a good day and a cynt on most.

Just got back from Day 2 at the Gabba as my lad has a game tomorrow up the coast. Jeez, we could have had them under alot more pressure if we hadn't been suckered into rash shots and - in Vince's case - run selection. Moeen not turning the ball nearly as much as Lyon and Woakes has been pretty poor but you've probably deduced as much from television coverage.
Post Reply