RugbyRebels

I wonder if this might be part of the problem in the UK.

Very tong in cheek.

Not sure if this applies to the report, the leak or the the article.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-53954492

Indications are that the virus is evolving to be less virulent to survive, and safe measures have broadly finally been embedded at large; not to mention medical advances .. a rough ride could be ahead but this seems worst-case.

now we just sit back and wait for a more deadly pathogen

Meanwhile, the government here are undoubtedly massaging the figures for political gain. We've now had a "giant spike" with "terrible figures" that include a massive 292 infections in 1 day and 4 deaths in a month.

These numbers are scary and must result in hospitals still not dealing with anything not covid related, while schools will surely have to close again.

Meanwhile, only people from the government's allies can get into the country - you can guess who... Duda for one.

Outside of densely populated countries, the virus has become less of a danger of itself, it seems.

Here's another underlying story that shows another difficult challenge in some areas.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-53954964

On a more positive note, fear of the pest should keep shitty kids at home on halloween and away from my cunting front door.

They normally wear masks and rarely come in groups larger than six, so it could be bau...they'll have to find the bucket of delights half-way down the drive though.

Meanwhile, more useful predictors of clog-poppability on admittance with Covid.
https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3339
(interestingly bmi not 1 of the 8 characteristics ; wt. not practically measurable perhaps )

What are thoughts about a general reduction in fatalities compared to infections?

Here, for instance, infections are on the rise, with record days after record days yet deaths are consistently low. Considering thoughts around the government, they could simply be massaging the figures to create a spike to force people to accept extra powers for the government. But they cannot massage actual deaths.

Imo, once excess deaths reaches 0, or close to 0, restrictions should probably be eased somewhat. And we’re kinda approaching that in Central Europe, even though figures are hard to come by.

Stom wrote:What are thoughts about a general reduction in fatalities compared to infections?

Here, for instance, infections are on the rise, with record days after record days yet deaths are consistently low. Considering thoughts around the government, they could simply be massaging the figures to create a spike to force people to accept extra powers for the government. But they cannot massage actual deaths.

Imo, once excess deaths reaches 0, or close to 0, restrictions should probably be eased somewhat. And we’re kinda approaching that in Central Europe, even though figures are hard to come by.

In Hungary, excess deaths are pretty much 0 as is, and have been throughout. The government does list the existing diseases of those who have died of covid and they were all pretty much dying. And you can’t say the government are deniers as they continue to have restrictions and play up the threat.

I don't trust shit coming from the government here. They are actively hamstringing scientists and physicians with the CDC. There is officially no Federal safety net here anymore, and that is quite some achievement.

https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/earl ... e5793.full

I see wankers gathering en masse calling everything they can't get their head around a hoax. There is no fucking way this is going away any time soon. Who am to rely on for accurate metrics for evidence-based decision making?

This is relevant to your initial query. If mortality : infection is indeed going down, that is great, but how is that measured? Is using a case: fatality measure more accurate given the existence of asymptomatic carriers? More young people are getting infected, but the risk of disease increases greatly with age, meaning it is possible that there could actually be an increase in cases (that is, people that develop symptoms) and maybe mortality also. What is the lag time used to determine symptomatic in the infected population? 1 day, 7, 14, more?

The public in countries that are hot spots are left to blindly navigate massaged, unavailable, or outright fabricated statistics. Good fucking luck. Drink, because you'll need courage. From a US perspective, it is the biggest public health failure I think I will experience in my lifetime.

morepork wrote:I don't trust shit coming from the government here. They are actively hamstringing scientists and physicians with the CDC. There is officially no Federal safety net here anymore, and that is quite some achievement.

https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/earl ... e5793.full

I see wankers gathering en masse calling everything they can't get their head around a hoax. There is no fucking way this is going away any time soon. Who am to rely on for accurate metrics for evidence-based decision making?

This is relevant to your initial query. If mortality : infection is indeed going down, that is great, but how is that measured? Is using a case: fatality measure more accurate given the existence of asymptomatic carriers? More young people are getting infected, but the risk of disease increases greatly with age, meaning it is possible that there could actually be an increase in cases (that is, people that develop symptoms) and maybe mortality also. What is the lag time used to determine symptomatic in the infected population? 1 day, 7, 14, more?

The public in countries that are hot spots are left to blindly navigate massaged, unavailable, or outright fabricated statistics. Good fucking luck. Drink, because you'll need courage. From a US perspective, it is the biggest public health failure I think I will experience in my lifetime.

Excuse my ignorance but what’s the difference? Here, the cases are records, the deaths are low single figures, and excess deaths are non existent.

The measures are worse than the actual virus here.

Stom wrote:

morepork wrote:I don't trust shit coming from the government here. They are actively hamstringing scientists and physicians with the CDC. There is officially no Federal safety net here anymore, and that is quite some achievement.

https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/earl ... e5793.full

I see wankers gathering en masse calling everything they can't get their head around a hoax. There is no fucking way this is going away any time soon. Who am to rely on for accurate metrics for evidence-based decision making?

This is relevant to your initial query. If mortality : infection is indeed going down, that is great, but how is that measured? Is using a case: fatality measure more accurate given the existence of asymptomatic carriers? More young people are getting infected, but the risk of disease increases greatly with age, meaning it is possible that there could actually be an increase in cases (that is, people that develop symptoms) and maybe mortality also. What is the lag time used to determine symptomatic in the infected population? 1 day, 7, 14, more?

The public in countries that are hot spots are left to blindly navigate massaged, unavailable, or outright fabricated statistics. Good fucking luck. Drink, because you'll need courage. From a US perspective, it is the biggest public health failure I think I will experience in my lifetime.

Excuse my ignorance but what’s the difference? Here, the cases are records, the deaths are low single figures, and excess deaths are non existent.

The measures are worse than the actual virus here.

Don't follow you, sorry.

Case = virus positive and symptomatic to the point of disease that needs treatment
Fatality = number of cases that end up terminal
Infection = positive for virus but not necessarily symptomatic or needing treatment


What do you mean by excess deaths?

morepork wrote:

Stom wrote:

morepork wrote:I don't trust shit coming from the government here. They are actively hamstringing scientists and physicians with the CDC. There is officially no Federal safety net here anymore, and that is quite some achievement.

https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/earl ... e5793.full

I see wankers gathering en masse calling everything they can't get their head around a hoax. There is no fucking way this is going away any time soon. Who am to rely on for accurate metrics for evidence-based decision making?

This is relevant to your initial query. If mortality : infection is indeed going down, that is great, but how is that measured? Is using a case: fatality measure more accurate given the existence of asymptomatic carriers? More young people are getting infected, but the risk of disease increases greatly with age, meaning it is possible that there could actually be an increase in cases (that is, people that develop symptoms) and maybe mortality also. What is the lag time used to determine symptomatic in the infected population? 1 day, 7, 14, more?

The public in countries that are hot spots are left to blindly navigate massaged, unavailable, or outright fabricated statistics. Good fucking luck. Drink, because you'll need courage. From a US perspective, it is the biggest public health failure I think I will experience in my lifetime.

Excuse my ignorance but what’s the difference? Here, the cases are records, the deaths are low single figures, and excess deaths are non existent.

The measures are worse than the actual virus here.

Don't follow you, sorry.

Case = virus positive and symptomatic to the point of disease that needs treatment
Fatality = number of cases that end up terminal
Infection = positive for virus but not necessarily symptomatic or needing treatment


What do you mean by excess deaths?

Ah, got you now.

Excess deaths is the number of deaths over the 5 year rolling average for that week. Here in Hungary, that number is, well, there isn’t one. Deaths are completely within the normal range and have been all year.

There have been 630ish total deaths where COVID is mentioned. But nearly all of these would have expected to die anyway.

I only have one example, where a tenant of a friend has died and had COVID put on the death certificate. He was an alcoholic and suffered liver failure and kidney failure.

There’s a reason there are so many conspiracy theorists here and when I tell them about the number of deaths in the UK or USA, they’re shocked. It really hasn’t impacted here, except to irritate the hell out of people.

But that is really interesting. Why?

People here are not healthy. The healthcare system is fucked. The population is old.

The only saving graces are population density and pollution levels, which are low.

Why is it so much less deadly or less contagious here?

Trolley-fall at A&E will reveal where we're at very soon.
We''ve lurched back to hot-spot alert (cases) after the holiday season, return to school and eating/drinking out.
The incidence/mortality rate for Covid is c. 10x that of flu, but this
appears to be of little threat to under 40's ( generally).
Population exposure to the virus here is still only c.10%, miles off the 70% required for herd immunity.
Maybe the virus has morphed and lost it's teeth, or the data is skewed...we're a while off a correctly validated vaccine it seems so given human behaviour traits, we still appear to be in the lap of the gods.

Stom wrote:

morepork wrote:

Stom wrote:
Excuse my ignorance but what’s the difference? Here, the cases are records, the deaths are low single figures, and excess deaths are non existent.

The measures are worse than the actual virus here.

Don't follow you, sorry.

Case = virus positive and symptomatic to the point of disease that needs treatment
Fatality = number of cases that end up terminal
Infection = positive for virus but not necessarily symptomatic or needing treatment


What do you mean by excess deaths?

Ah, got you now.

Excess deaths is the number of deaths over the 5 year rolling average for that week. Here in Hungary, that number is, well, there isn’t one. Deaths are completely within the normal range and have been all year.

There have been 630ish total deaths where COVID is mentioned. But nearly all of these would have expected to die anyway.

I only have one example, where a tenant of a friend has died and had COVID put on the death certificate. He was an alcoholic and suffered liver failure and kidney failure.

There’s a reason there are so many conspiracy theorists here and when I tell them about the number of deaths in the UK or USA, they’re shocked. It really hasn’t impacted here, except to irritate the hell out of people.

But that is really interesting. Why?

People here are not healthy. The healthcare system is fucked. The population is old.

The only saving graces are population density and pollution levels, which are low.

Why is it so much less deadly or less contagious here?

What levels of domestic travel do you have there? Particularly air travel. The US has insane numbers of people traveling by plane, there are no compulsory quarantine procedures and so many holes in restricted international travel that it is completely ineffectual. From what I can see of the UK, they have people jetting around Spain, Italy, and France mere months after these places were hotspots. Its fucking madness.

morepork wrote:

Stom wrote:

morepork wrote:
Don't follow you, sorry.

Case = virus positive and symptomatic to the point of disease that needs treatment
Fatality = number of cases that end up terminal
Infection = positive for virus but not necessarily symptomatic or needing treatment


What do you mean by excess deaths?

Ah, got you now.

Excess deaths is the number of deaths over the 5 year rolling average for that week. Here in Hungary, that number is, well, there isn’t one. Deaths are completely within the normal range and have been all year.

There have been 630ish total deaths where COVID is mentioned. But nearly all of these would have expected to die anyway.

I only have one example, where a tenant of a friend has died and had COVID put on the death certificate. He was an alcoholic and suffered liver failure and kidney failure.

There’s a reason there are so many conspiracy theorists here and when I tell them about the number of deaths in the UK or USA, they’re shocked. It really hasn’t impacted here, except to irritate the hell out of people.

But that is really interesting. Why?

People here are not healthy. The healthcare system is fucked. The population is old.

The only saving graces are population density and pollution levels, which are low.

Why is it so much less deadly or less contagious here?

What levels of domestic travel do you have there? Particularly air travel. The US has insane numbers of people traveling by plane, there are no compulsory quarantine procedures and so many holes in restricted international travel that it is completely ineffectual. From what I can see of the UK, they have people jetting around Spain, Italy, and France mere months after these places were hotspots. Its fucking madness.

That I agree.

No real air travel, borders are closed, though we were told that we could go on holiday to Croatia, though we shouldn’t, but we could. So half the country did, including all the politicians.

That can explain the spike in cases but death rate is sell low.

Stom wrote:

morepork wrote:

Stom wrote:
Ah, got you now.

Excess deaths is the number of deaths over the 5 year rolling average for that week. Here in Hungary, that number is, well, there isn’t one. Deaths are completely within the normal range and have been all year.

There have been 630ish total deaths where COVID is mentioned. But nearly all of these would have expected to die anyway.

I only have one example, where a tenant of a friend has died and had COVID put on the death certificate. He was an alcoholic and suffered liver failure and kidney failure.

There’s a reason there are so many conspiracy theorists here and when I tell them about the number of deaths in the UK or USA, they’re shocked. It really hasn’t impacted here, except to irritate the hell out of people.

But that is really interesting. Why?

People here are not healthy. The healthcare system is fucked. The population is old.

The only saving graces are population density and pollution levels, which are low.

Why is it so much less deadly or less contagious here?

What levels of domestic travel do you have there? Particularly air travel. The US has insane numbers of people traveling by plane, there are no compulsory quarantine procedures and so many holes in restricted international travel that it is completely ineffectual. From what I can see of the UK, they have people jetting around Spain, Italy, and France mere months after these places were hotspots. Its fucking madness.

That I agree.

No real air travel, borders are closed, though we were told that we could go on holiday to Croatia, though we shouldn’t, but we could. So half the country did, including all the politicians.

That can explain the spike in cases but death rate is sell low.

4 deaths yesterday, 1 had chronic heart disease and was clinically obese, another had heart disease and type 1 diabetes, other 2 both had conditions but I’ll not sure how serious, the government lists them all:

https://koronavirus.gov.hu/elhunytak

The testing backlog I was told earlier has snuck in as a load of those people who were working on doing the tests in the various labs have gone back to their normal jobs, obviously they were qualified for the work but in the main they work in research and whatnot and haven't been kept plugging away just on covid, and in many ways that makes sense, a lot of them might leave if they were told all they'd be doing now was covid tests and anyway it's not like we don't want the other research. And I was also told the government didn't see they as being a problem because they budgeted for case loads to remain at much lower levels than we're actually seeing, and they hadn't allowed for so many test requests from people without symptoms

We are though now at the point where the government is saying testing is in place, and this might mean in practice an institution, say a school, has 2,500 attendees and that site is considered covered by HMG if they have a dozen testing kits available to use when really, really needed. Hancock for the win, again.

Digby wrote:The testing backlog I was told earlier has snuck in as a load of those people who were working on doing the tests in the various labs have gone back to their normal jobs, obviously they were qualified for the work but in the main they work in research and whatnot and haven't been kept plugging away just on covid, and in many ways that makes sense, a lot of them might leave if they were told all they'd be doing now was covid tests and anyway it's not like we don't want the other research. And I was also told the government didn't see they as being a problem because they budgeted for case loads to remain at much lower levels than we're actually seeing, and they hadn't allowed for so many test requests from people without symptoms

We are though now at the point where the government is saying testing is in place, and this might mean in practice an institution, say a school, has 2,500 attendees and that site is considered covered by HMG if they have a dozen testing kits available to use when really, really needed. Hancock for the win, again.

Moonshot needed, target a million billion tests a day.

Good news but it’s from one of those bastard links that won’t let you go back to your previous page.
The more you read the more you hope we can mitigate the worst of any second wave. Fingers crossed.

Testing times.

Nice to see that Edward Argar, Minister of State for Health, used to work for Serco.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Argar

So today we're to be told we're in the last chance saloon by the scientists, this coming hard on the message of the last few weeks of get your arses back to work, eat out to help out and the like. Government messaging continues to be all over the shop, Charlie used to have more accuracy kicking for England back in the day.

Whilst the scientists are telling us we're about to be fucked the cabinet will be locked in a meeting with Matt Shankedcock arguing for a bigger shutdown, Rishi Sunak arguing any shutdown should be business friendly and Gavin Williamson arguing schools should be kept open unless after the fact that turns out to be wrong.