Re: Super Semis?
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 10:10 am
Welp, if James Lowe had any chance of being an All Black, this game has definitely set back his claims.
Spy wrote:Excellent defensive effort by the Hurricanes tonight. Really got up in the Chiefs faces, made some big hits, won a few maul turnovers, and some tough goal line defence.
Does Barrett play entire games at 10?Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Beauden Barrett and Ardie Savea are astonishing talents.
Waist level. I'd be pissed if I only ever recieved passes at waist height. Chest height bro, chest height.Spiffy wrote:Just watched the second semi. Lions v. Highlanders. Lions looking quite sharp but some god-awful passing skills from both teams. You'd think that full time professionals would be able to put the ball in front of the receiver at waist level. Several potential scoring chances fluffed by bad passes.
Half these professionals can't hit the chest either much of the time (I still think it's easier to catch on the belly-button). Also very common is the firing of the pass directly at the receiver instead of in front of him, so that he has to check his run to catch it, instead of accelerating on to it. When you see a perfect pass these days, with just the right timing, placement and weight, it looks great because it's fairly rare.Len wrote:Waist level. I'd be pissed if I only ever recieved passes at waist height. Chest height bro, chest height.Spiffy wrote:Just watched the second semi. Lions v. Highlanders. Lions looking quite sharp but some god-awful passing skills from both teams. You'd think that full time professionals would be able to put the ball in front of the receiver at waist level. Several potential scoring chances fluffed by bad passes.
The Chiefs were actually dominating for most of the first quarter, but once they lost the momentum, that was pretty much it for them. The Hurricanes got lucky in not having anyone sent to the bin after 5 or 6 successive penalties while the Chiefs were banging on the tryline, and once they withstood that, the Chiefs' structure and discipline pretty much just collapsed.rowan wrote:Wow![]()
I am surprised - mostly I'm surprised the Chiefs were so bad. *snip* The way they've played at home this season I'm sure they would've take the final there. But travelling to NZ and beating the Canes is a whole different matter. I expect the Wellington outfit to finally clinch a long overdue championship title next week, but after 20 years of disappointment I'll believe it when I see it . . .
Spiffy wrote:Half these professionals can't hit the chest either much of the time (I still think it's easier to catch on the belly-button). Also very common is the firing of the pass directly at the receiver instead of in front of him, so that he has to check his run to catch it, instead of accelerating on to it. When you see a perfect pass these days, with just the right timing, placement and weight, it looks great because it's fairly rare.Len wrote:Waist level. I'd be pissed if I only ever recieved passes at waist height. Chest height bro, chest height.Spiffy wrote:Just watched the second semi. Lions v. Highlanders. Lions looking quite sharp but some god-awful passing skills from both teams. You'd think that full time professionals would be able to put the ball in front of the receiver at waist level. Several potential scoring chances fluffed by bad passes.
OK. Waist/chest, who cares. My point was all about putting the ball where the reciever can catch it. Not behind him, over his head, at his ankles or straight into touch.Doorzetbornandbred wrote:Spiffy wrote:Half these professionals can't hit the chest either much of the time (I still think it's easier to catch on the belly-button). Also very common is the firing of the pass directly at the receiver instead of in front of him, so that he has to check his run to catch it, instead of accelerating on to it. When you see a perfect pass these days, with just the right timing, placement and weight, it looks great because it's fairly rare.Len wrote:
Waist level. I'd be pissed if I only ever recieved passes at waist height. Chest height bro, chest height.
Im with Len on this, chest height and you can pass off the "wrong foot", waist height the chances are you'd be throwing a fall away pass and heading in the wrong direction. Also you'd be looking down to catch the ball losing all hope of scanning what's in front of you.
Spiffy wrote:OK. Waist/chest, who cares. My point was all about putting the ball where the reciever can catch it. Not behind him, over his head, at his ankles or straight into touch.Doorzetbornandbred wrote:Spiffy wrote:
Half these professionals can't hit the chest either much of the time (I still think it's easier to catch on the belly-button). Also very common is the firing of the pass directly at the receiver instead of in front of him, so that he has to check his run to catch it, instead of accelerating on to it. When you see a perfect pass these days, with just the right timing, placement and weight, it looks great because it's fairly rare.
Im with Len on this, chest height and you can pass off the "wrong foot", waist height the chances are you'd be throwing a fall away pass and heading in the wrong direction. Also you'd be looking down to catch the ball losing all hope of scanning what's in front of you.
Maybe. But whether your arms are up or down, you will not catch anything that is thrown behind you, over your head, at your ankles or straight into touch. I stick to my original point that a lot of (too many) professional rugby players can't pass for peanuts.morepork wrote:Spiffy wrote:OK. Waist/chest, who cares. My point was all about putting the ball where the reciever can catch it. Not behind him, over his head, at his ankles or straight into touch.Doorzetbornandbred wrote:
Im with Len on this, chest height and you can pass off the "wrong foot", waist height the chances are you'd be throwing a fall away pass and heading in the wrong direction. Also you'd be looking down to catch the ball losing all hope of scanning what's in front of you.
It's all in the details baby. If your arms are down when you receive you will get pinned in the tackle.
Lizard wrote:You would have to say that the two better teams on the day won.
I kept rewinding the Chiefs game to see if the Canes rush defence was off-side but they never were. Very impressive. The Chiefs didn't match that and didn't take their scoring opportunities in the first half. Barrett was sublime, definitely shading Cruden IMHO. I think we will see Barrett starting with McKenzie covering 1st 5/FB in the upcoming championship.
As for the Highlanders, it turns out that Ben Smith can't carry the whole team on his own.
I just hope that the Hurricanes don't find a way to cock the final up. It would be just like them to ruin NZ's perfect 7-from-7 finals wins at home against foreign opposition.