RugbyRebels

Donny osmond wrote:Bond films have been pants for years, nowhere near competing with bourne or mission impossible series. Hell, even Val Kilmers Saint was a better film than any of the recent Bond films.

Sent from my XT1052 using Tapatalk

I might give you Bourne but Mission Impossible has always been shithouse. Only good thing about the latest one is that it was blatently sponsored by BMW in some way.

Brosnan just didn't look like he could do any damage. He looks like a guy I would bully in the checkout queue at Tescos. Craig looks like a spy at least. Its like comparing Mehrtens to Carter.

As for the Bond name hand me down thing. In Skyfall you see his parents grave, it says Bond on it. So thats that. Its not a name handed down in MI5. Also how stupid would you have to be as a criminal mastermind to not have heard that name. Its like your sitting down at a poker table and some British guy introduces himself as 'Bond, James Bond'

You'd be like, didn't some cnut named James Bond blow up my mates stealth boat a few years back? Yeah. Oh hey this guys a spy!

Len wrote:

Donny osmond wrote:Bond films have been pants for years, nowhere near competing with bourne or mission impossible series. Hell, even Val Kilmers Saint was a better film than any of the recent Bond films.

Sent from my XT1052 using Tapatalk

I might give you Bourne but Mission Impossible has always been shithouse. Only good thing about the latest one is that it was blatently sponsored by BMW in some way.

Actually, the last 3 Mission Impossible movies have had far more consistent quality than the Craig Bonds, 2 of which were excellent and 2 of which were shit. MI:3, Ghost Protocol and Rogue Nation are all vastly superior to Something of Boris and Spectre.

Len wrote:Brosnan just didn't look like he could do any damage. He looks like a guy I would bully in the checkout queue at Tescos. Craig looks like a spy at least. Its like comparing Mehrtens to Carter.

As for the Bond name hand me down thing. In Skyfall you see his parents grave, it says Bond on it. So thats that. Its not a name handed down in MI5. Also how stupid would you have to be as a criminal mastermind to not have heard that name. Its like your sitting down at a poker table and some British guy introduces himself as 'Bond, James Bond'

You'd be like, didn't some cnut named James Bond blow up my mates stealth boat a few years back? Yeah. Oh hey this guys a spy!

He's obviously a Timelord, you noob.

Couldn't a female Bond film start with him/her checking out of a gender reassignment clinic?

Lizard wrote:Couldn't a female Bond film start with him/her checking out of a gender reassignment clinic?

That would work. Or a meeting with M asking whether he had to go so deep undercover that an actual operation was required.

Len wrote:

Donny osmond wrote:Bond films have been pants for years, nowhere near competing with bourne or mission impossible series. Hell, even Val Kilmers Saint was a better film than any of the recent Bond films.

Sent from my XT1052 using Tapatalk

I might give you Bourne but Mission Impossible has always been shithouse. Only good thing about the latest one is that it was blatently sponsored by BMW in some way.

i agree but it's still better than any bond film has been lately

Lizard wrote:Couldn't a female Bond film start with him/her checking out of a gender reassignment clinic?

Ah yes, the "Saints Row 2 if female option for The Protagonist is chosen" gambit.

morepork wrote:Sam Smith is a warbling little bitch.

Amen.

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:

Lizard wrote:Couldn't a female Bond film start with him/her checking out of a gender reassignment clinic?

That would work. Or a meeting with M asking whether he had to go so deep undercover that an actual operation was required.

Then cast an actual trans actress like Laverne Cox or Jamie Clayton.