Re: Racism accusations
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2023 4:27 pm
Ah, got it. So when Joe Marler called Samson Lee a "gypsum boy" he really meant he was a plaster saint?
That is not a statement you make lightly, and especially the RFU!Mellsblue wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 3:48 pm The RFU really are not happy:
https://www.englandrugby.com/news/artic ... tober-2023
agree, sounds a bit of p!ss take - refs. are neutral and this is a clear means of letting all know who they're talking about.
It mainly says the RFU are a bunch of arseholes. In a shouting stadium of 80k people (albeit some English fans so maybe not as noisy as normal) it's not possible for someone to have made an innocent mistake of what they heard? When there's not a single other witness? With language and accents also potentially an issue? I wouldn't prosecute that in a million years.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 6:51 pmThat is not a statement you make lightly, and especially the RFU!Mellsblue wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 3:48 pm The RFU really are not happy:
https://www.englandrugby.com/news/artic ... tober-2023
They will know the kant/ side Afrikaans conversations and still make this statement, which says a LOT!
Is it also not possible that he called him a white cunt?Eugene Wrayburn wrote: ↑Sat Oct 28, 2023 5:15 pmIt mainly says the RFU are a bunch of arseholes. In a shouting stadium of 80k people (albeit some English fans so maybe not as noisy as normal) it's not possible for someone to have made an innocent mistake of what they heard? When there's not a single other witness? With language and accents also potentially an issue? I wouldn't prosecute that in a million years.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 6:51 pmThat is not a statement you make lightly, and especially the RFU!Mellsblue wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 3:48 pm The RFU really are not happy:
https://www.englandrugby.com/news/artic ... tober-2023
They will know the kant/ side Afrikaans conversations and still make this statement, which says a LOT!
Of course it is. But the RFU don't acknowledge anything other than the one, really very unlikely, possibility. The strength with which they've gone in their statement is wholly disproportionate tio the certainty they can possibly have. If there were half a dozen witnesses, or an admission or a recording then have at it. However in the circumstances, it's wholly inappropriate. A proper statement would be something along the lines of "whilst we have no doubt whatsoever in Curry's truthfulness we understand, but don't agree with, World Rugby's inability to be certain as to it's accuracy".Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Sun Oct 29, 2023 2:56 pmIs it also not possible that he called him a white cunt?Eugene Wrayburn wrote: ↑Sat Oct 28, 2023 5:15 pmIt mainly says the RFU are a bunch of arseholes. In a shouting stadium of 80k people (albeit some English fans so maybe not as noisy as normal) it's not possible for someone to have made an innocent mistake of what they heard? When there's not a single other witness? With language and accents also potentially an issue? I wouldn't prosecute that in a million years.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 6:51 pm
That is not a statement you make lightly, and especially the RFU!
They will know the kant/ side Afrikaans conversations and still make this statement, which says a LOT!
Really very unlikely? They’ve spoken to the player who called it out. That appears enough for them to make such a statement. That says a lot.Eugene Wrayburn wrote: ↑Sun Oct 29, 2023 4:38 pmOf course it is. But the RFU don't acknowledge anything other than the one, really very unlikely, possibility. The strength with which they've gone in their statement is wholly disproportionate tio the certainty they can possibly have. If there were half a dozen witnesses, or an admission or a recording then have at it. However in the circumstances, it's wholly inappropriate. A proper statement would be something along the lines of "whilst we have no doubt whatsoever in Curry's truthfulness we understand, but don't agree with, World Rugby's inability to be certain as to it's accuracy".Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Sun Oct 29, 2023 2:56 pmIs it also not possible that he called him a white cunt?Eugene Wrayburn wrote: ↑Sat Oct 28, 2023 5:15 pm
It mainly says the RFU are a bunch of arseholes. In a shouting stadium of 80k people (albeit some English fans so maybe not as noisy as normal) it's not possible for someone to have made an innocent mistake of what they heard? When there's not a single other witness? With language and accents also potentially an issue? I wouldn't prosecute that in a million years.
In the context of a rugby match there is nowhere to go without the ref. Getting precious about the principles is self-defeating, frankly. Sometimes, no matter how wrong, these things have to be swallowed unfortunately.
It's the victim's own fault for making a fuss!
Yes, really very unlikely. Or are you unaware of the South African context? How many South Africans do you think would swallow their team mate wandering around calling players white cunts? Or do you think Curry is uniquely cunt-ish to Bongi that is only ever directed at him and not the hundreds of other white players he's faced? Think of the loss of control that would be needed for a South African to do this. So yes I'll stick with really very unlikely.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Sun Oct 29, 2023 4:51 pmReally very unlikely? They’ve spoken to the player who called it out. That appears enough for them to make such a statement. That says a lot.Eugene Wrayburn wrote: ↑Sun Oct 29, 2023 4:38 pmOf course it is. But the RFU don't acknowledge anything other than the one, really very unlikely, possibility. The strength with which they've gone in their statement is wholly disproportionate tio the certainty they can possibly have. If there were half a dozen witnesses, or an admission or a recording then have at it. However in the circumstances, it's wholly inappropriate. A proper statement would be something along the lines of "whilst we have no doubt whatsoever in Curry's truthfulness we understand, but don't agree with, World Rugby's inability to be certain as to it's accuracy".Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Sun Oct 29, 2023 2:56 pm
Is it also not possible that he called him a white cunt?
Being South African does not make him immune to being a racist or making a racist comment. There’s no loss of control needed at all when in close proximity to a player to make such a comment.Eugene Wrayburn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 9:10 amYes, really very unlikely. Or are you unaware of the South African context? How many South Africans do you think would swallow their team mate wandering around calling players white cunts? Or do you think Curry is uniquely cunt-ish to Bongi that is only ever directed at him and not the hundreds of other white players he's faced? Think of the loss of control that would be needed for a South African to do this. So yes I'll stick with really very unlikely.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Sun Oct 29, 2023 4:51 pmReally very unlikely? They’ve spoken to the player who called it out. That appears enough for them to make such a statement. That says a lot.Eugene Wrayburn wrote: ↑Sun Oct 29, 2023 4:38 pm
Of course it is. But the RFU don't acknowledge anything other than the one, really very unlikely, possibility. The strength with which they've gone in their statement is wholly disproportionate tio the certainty they can possibly have. If there were half a dozen witnesses, or an admission or a recording then have at it. However in the circumstances, it's wholly inappropriate. A proper statement would be something along the lines of "whilst we have no doubt whatsoever in Curry's truthfulness we understand, but don't agree with, World Rugby's inability to be certain as to it's accuracy".
Luckily enough it isn't the one I expressed. But then actually dealing with the one I expressed might be more challenging so you were completely right to have nothing at all to do with it.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 10:08 amBeing South African does not make him immune to being a racist or making a racist comment. There’s no loss of control needed at all when in close proximity to a player to make such a comment.Eugene Wrayburn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 9:10 amYes, really very unlikely. Or are you unaware of the South African context? How many South Africans do you think would swallow their team mate wandering around calling players white cunts? Or do you think Curry is uniquely cunt-ish to Bongi that is only ever directed at him and not the hundreds of other white players he's faced? Think of the loss of control that would be needed for a South African to do this. So yes I'll stick with really very unlikely.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Sun Oct 29, 2023 4:51 pm
Really very unlikely? They’ve spoken to the player who called it out. That appears enough for them to make such a statement. That says a lot.
I’m extremely unlikely to be racist because I’m South African is frankly a laughable view.