Page 9 of 9

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RWC matches without individual threads.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 3:18 pm
by J Dory
Mellsblue wrote:
J Dory wrote:
Mellsblue wrote: I have better things to do than find it. Plus, it might’ve just been their podcast. I know I said I’d have a look back on Friday but that was whilst looking to waste work’s time, not mine. Use Google but it’ll be behind a paywall. As Diggers said, they might merely have been the first to object. Jones certainly doesn’t seem to mind. As I said, NZ were well within their rights and therefore shouldn’t shoulder any blame.
So doesn't exist, aka you're full of shit.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
I waste enough time on here as it is. I’m not spending anymore time on it because you’re too lazy to look for it. I couldn’t care less if you don’t believe me.
I did look.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RWC matches without individual threads.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 3:27 pm
by Mellsblue
J Dory wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:
J Dory wrote:So doesn't exist, aka you're full of shit.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
I waste enough time on here as it is. I’m not spending anymore time on it because you’re too lazy to look for it. I couldn’t care less if you don’t believe me.
I did look.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
Congrats.

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RWC matches without individual threads.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 4:51 pm
by J Dory
Mellsblue wrote:
J Dory wrote:
Mellsblue wrote: I waste enough time on here as it is. I’m not spending anymore time on it because you’re too lazy to look for it. I couldn’t care less if you don’t believe me.
I did look.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
Congrats.
I thought you were busy, or was that just another of your seemingly endless stream of lies?

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RWC matches without individual threads.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 5:29 pm
by Mellsblue
J Dory wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:
J Dory wrote:I did look.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
Congrats.
I thought you were busy, or was that just another of your seemingly endless stream of lies?

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
Endless stream of lies?!?!? Where are your sources?
Look, I get in to enough silly arguments on here to avoid this one. Sit down, take a deep breath and wonder why I’d lie about it. If you still think I’ve made it up, ask yourself why, earlier today, I agreed, with Diggers of all people, that NZ may have just got in first with a ‘no’, state’s that England look happy with the outcome so may have said ‘no’ themselves, and also defended NZ by saying that if the rules allow them not to play they are perfectly within the rights not to change their itinerary.
I was merely reporting what I read and/or heard. To reiterate:
I DONT BLAME NEW ZEALAND FOR ANY OF THIS. I JUST THINK THAT WR HAVE ROYALLY F**KED UP.

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RWC matches without individual threads.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 6:58 pm
by J Dory
Mellsblue wrote:
J Dory wrote:
Mellsblue wrote: Congrats.
I thought you were busy, or was that just another of your seemingly endless stream of lies?

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
Endless stream of lies?!?!? Where are your sources?
Look, I get in to enough silly arguments on here to avoid this one. Sit down, take a deep breath and wonder why I’d lie about it. If you still think I’ve made it up, ask yourself why, earlier today, I agreed, with Diggers of all people, that NZ may have just got in first with a ‘no’, state’s that England look happy with the outcome so may have said ‘no’ themselves, and also defended NZ by saying that if the rules allow them not to play they are perfectly within the rights not to change their itinerary.
I was merely reporting what I read and/or heard. To reiterate:
I DONT BLAME NEW ZEALAND FOR ANY OF THIS. I JUST THINK THAT WR HAVE ROYALLY F**KED UP.
Except NZ didn't say no, it didn't happen, as stated by world rugby.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RWC matches without individual threads.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:21 pm
by Mellsblue
J Dory wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:
J Dory wrote:I thought you were busy, or was that just another of your seemingly endless stream of lies?

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
Endless stream of lies?!?!? Where are your sources?
Look, I get in to enough silly arguments on here to avoid this one. Sit down, take a deep breath and wonder why I’d lie about it. If you still think I’ve made it up, ask yourself why, earlier today, I agreed, with Diggers of all people, that NZ may have just got in first with a ‘no’, state’s that England look happy with the outcome so may have said ‘no’ themselves, and also defended NZ by saying that if the rules allow them not to play they are perfectly within the rights not to change their itinerary.
I was merely reporting what I read and/or heard. To reiterate:
I DONT BLAME NEW ZEALAND FOR ANY OF THIS. I JUST THINK THAT WR HAVE ROYALLY F**KED UP.
Except NZ didn't say no, it didn't happen, as stated by world rugby.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
Cool. I didn’t say it definitely happened, just that I’d heard/read it had happened. You’re the one who then went off the deep end saying I was conveying an “endless stream of lies” and was “full of shit”.
Think about it. I just relayed what I had read/heard elsewhere to help inform debate. You then became offensive because you didn’t like what I’d written.

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RWC matches without individual threads.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:27 pm
by J Dory
Mellsblue wrote:
J Dory wrote:
Mellsblue wrote: Endless stream of lies?!?!? Where are your sources?
Look, I get in to enough silly arguments on here to avoid this one. Sit down, take a deep breath and wonder why I’d lie about it. If you still think I’ve made it up, ask yourself why, earlier today, I agreed, with Diggers of all people, that NZ may have just got in first with a ‘no’, state’s that England look happy with the outcome so may have said ‘no’ themselves, and also defended NZ by saying that if the rules allow them not to play they are perfectly within the rights not to change their itinerary.
I was merely reporting what I read and/or heard. To reiterate:
I DONT BLAME NEW ZEALAND FOR ANY OF THIS. I JUST THINK THAT WR HAVE ROYALLY F**KED UP.
Except NZ didn't say no, it didn't happen, as stated by world rugby.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
Cool. I didn’t say it definitely happened, just that I’d heard/read it had happened. You’re the one who then went off the deep end saying I was conveying an “endless stream of lies” and was “full of shit”.
Think about it. I just relayed what I had read/heard elsewhere to help inform debate. You then became offensive because you didn’t like what I’d written.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/a ... d=12275656

See how that works? When you tell the truth you can back it with a link. You went from multiple sources to being too busy to paste a link, though having ample time for long winded diatribes as you desperately clamour to maintain the moral high ground. I'm done, the floor is all yours champ.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RWC matches without individual threads.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:37 pm
by Mellsblue
J Dory wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:
J Dory wrote:Except NZ didn't say no, it didn't happen, as stated by world rugby.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
Cool. I didn’t say it definitely happened, just that I’d heard/read it had happened. You’re the one who then went off the deep end saying I was conveying an “endless stream of lies” and was “full of shit”.
Think about it. I just relayed what I had read/heard elsewhere to help inform debate. You then became offensive because you didn’t like what I’d written.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/a ... d=12275656

See how that works? When you tell the truth you can back it with a link. You went from multiple sources to being too busy to paste a link, though having ample time for long winded diatribes as you desperately clamour to maintain the moral high ground. I'm done, the floor is all yours champ.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
Cheers, mate. Note I didn’t ask for a link. I just believed that you wouldn’t make up something so trivial.

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RWC matches without individual threads.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:42 pm
by Mellsblue
J Dory wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:
J Dory wrote:So doesn't exist, aka you're full of shit.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
I waste enough time on here as it is. I’m not spending anymore time on it because you’re too lazy to look for it. I couldn’t care less if you don’t believe me.
I did look.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
Fuck me. You can’t have looked very hard.

https://www.ruck.co.uk/brian-moore-reve ... aly-clash/

Check the times between this post and my previous one.
Think about it. WR have had to come out to categorically state NZ didn’t refuse. Either my lie on RR travelled round the world bloody quickly or it wasn’t a lie at all.

Re: RWC matches without individual threads.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 8:52 pm
by p/d
I’m beginning to doubt you follow Bedford’s fortunes

Re: RWC matches without individual threads.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:24 pm
by Mellsblue
p/d wrote:I’m beginning to doubt you follow Bedford’s fortunes
Are you joking? I remember the glory days when we were in the Premier League. David Weatheral at Center half, Dean Windass knocking them in from all angles. Valley Parade is like a second home to me.

Re: RE: Re: RWC matches without individual threads.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:23 pm
by J Dory
Mellsblue wrote:
p/d wrote:I’m beginning to doubt you follow Bedford’s fortunes
Are you joking? I remember the glory days when we were in the Premier League. David Weatheral at Center half, Dean Windass knocking them in from all angles. Valley Parade is like a second home to me.
You have no credibility here.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk