Samoa wants £160K cut

Moderator: morepork

Post Reply
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7529
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by morepork »

Pretty much. They are keen to have their fingers in pies all over the pacific. The Germans tried it last century.

Oh yeah, and because ROWAN LIKES TO WANK OFF LITTLE DOGS.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by rowan »

rowan wrote:
rowan wrote:
rowan wrote:
Image

I should apologize for any undue offense which may have been caused to the people in this photo . . .
Morepork in the middle? I pick him for being a short guy on account of his massive chip :ugeek:
Looks like that question just got answered. Let's see, has a chip about Pacific Islanders, a chip about the Chinese, a chip about the Germans - but chooses to live in the US. :roll:
Last edited by rowan on Fri Nov 10, 2017 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
kk67
Posts: 2117
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by kk67 »

It's not a huge amount of money they have 'donated' but there will be a concrete return (quite literally).
Like FIFA.....this is just what they are publicly declaring. I smell brown envelopes.

Anyone know what the roads are like in Samoa..?.
Last edited by kk67 on Fri Nov 10, 2017 4:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by rowan »

Well, it was only one company, not the government in Beijing, and they made a big enough donation to help out the SRU in its hour of need. Can't fault them for that. Whatever else the Chinese are doing, they are not bombing people all over the world. My kind of people 8-)
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
kk67
Posts: 2117
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by kk67 »

rowan wrote:Well, it was only one company, not the government in Beijing, and they made a big enough donation to help out the SRU in its hour of need. Can't fault them for that. Whatever else the Chinese are doing, they are not bombing people all over the world. My kind of people 8-)
That's fair.
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7529
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by morepork »

what does "have a chip about Pacific Islanders mean"?? If you are in any way insinuating racism on my part, be assured I will fucking call you out on it you sanctimonious prick.

I choose to live in the US. Oh my God, that settles it. You have totally worked me out. Fuckhead. Where are you from superstar, and what's your deal?
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by rowan »

kk67 wrote:
rowan wrote:Well, it was only one company, not the government in Beijing, and they made a big enough donation to help out the SRU in its hour of need. Can't fault them for that. Whatever else the Chinese are doing, they are not bombing people all over the world. My kind of people 8-)
That's fair.
Thanks, KK67. Good chatting :)
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by Digby »

rowan wrote:Well, it was only one company, not the government in Beijing, and they made a big enough donation to help out the SRU in its hour of need. Can't fault them for that. Whatever else the Chinese are doing, they are not bombing people all over the world. My kind of people 8-)
Expansionist and asset strippers, serial polluters, brutal suppressants of democracy, they certainly seem your kind of people
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by rowan »

Digby wrote:
rowan wrote:Well, it was only one company, not the government in Beijing, and they made a big enough donation to help out the SRU in its hour of need. Can't fault them for that. Whatever else the Chinese are doing, they are not bombing people all over the world. My kind of people 8-)
Expansionist and asset strippers, serial polluters, brutal suppressants of democracy, they certainly seem your kind of people
Looks like the hayseed chewing brigade is back with the Yellow Peril paranoia. Lay off the moonshine, bawgh! At least they haven't bombed over 70 countries since WWII and murdered upward of 20 million people.
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by Digby »

rowan wrote:
Digby wrote:
rowan wrote:Well, it was only one company, not the government in Beijing, and they made a big enough donation to help out the SRU in its hour of need. Can't fault them for that. Whatever else the Chinese are doing, they are not bombing people all over the world. My kind of people 8-)
Expansionist and asset strippers, serial polluters, brutal suppressants of democracy, they certainly seem your kind of people
Looks like the hayseed chewing brigade is back with the Yellow Peril paranoia. Lay off the moonshine, bawgh! At least they haven't bombed over 70 countries since WWII and murdered upward of 20 million people.
Still inspired by Trump to just make crap up I see. And yes other nations aren't all good, but I still don't know I'd look at the actions of Chinese authority and think that's the way to behave
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by rowan »

Well, aside from your confusion over suffixing and failure to acknowledge the generosity of one construction company because they happen to be Chinese, I hardly think Operation Condor or its 21st century sequel were exactly designed to promote democracy, nor was the murder of enlightened African leaders such as Patrice Lumumba, Kwame Nkrumah, Eduardo Mondlane, Amílcar Cabral, Steve Biko, Samora Machel and John Garang - and propping up brutal dictators in their place - and nor was the support for the Apartheid regime in South Africa and its ongoing mirror image in Israel, and let's not even get started with the medieval regime in Arabia, while reducing native populations to minorities and imposing democracy on them has nothing to do with freedom and a lot more to do with disenfranchisement and racial oppression.
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by Digby »

rowan wrote:Well, aside from your confusion over suffixing and failure to acknowledge the generosity .
So you'd like now to acknowledge the generosity of the RFU? I don't happen to think it that impressive so it feels odd to tip one's hat to the RFU, odder still though to acknowledge one donation and ignore another
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by rowan »

But that has been acknowledged by the attention it is receiving here, and nobody has disparaged it. My only point has been that a percentage of the gate rather than a straightforward hand-out would provide more incentive to the Samoan team and withal allow them to retain a little more self-respect, as their cut would be based at least partly on their own marketability. That's not downplaying the RFU's contribution but merely analysing the method by comparison.The idea that England's offer has been ignored is ludicrous since it has been one of the central themes in this discussion all along (when discussion was permitted, that is).
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7529
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by morepork »

Meat raffle?
User avatar
cashead
Posts: 4005
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:34 am

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by cashead »

Digby wrote:
rowan wrote:Well, it was only one company, not the government in Beijing, and they made a big enough donation to help out the SRU in its hour of need. Can't fault them for that. Whatever else the Chinese are doing, they are not bombing people all over the world. My kind of people 8-)
Expansionist and asset strippers, serial polluters, brutal suppressants of democracy, they certainly seem your kind of people
Also overcompensatory homophobes that hang out with armies of leather daddies.
I'm a god
How can you kill a god?
Shame on you, sweet Nerevar
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by rowan »

The Samoan perspective:

In fact, it is a crime that the Northern Hemisphere countries have deliberately structured the rules around the organisation of the game to protect their own interests and pockets for years.

Many of us think that both Australia and New Zealand representatives could have applied much more pressure around the World Rugby boardroom table for fairness over the years but they too, were enjoying the fact they could cherry pick island players to bolster their sides and seemed reluctant to take a stronger stance.

So where does that leave us and other Pacific nations?

We believe some of the adverse publicity about the lack of money for smaller rugby playing countries has garnered a sympathetic hearing from rugby fans and players around the world.

Inherent unfairness is something most humans will respond to strongly and it appears that this is happening.

And isn’t the word ‘fair’ bandied around in sport from when children begin taking part as toddlers?

Perhaps the most extreme way to look at the situation of small island nations not getting a share of the gate takings in the sport of rugby where you must have two teams is to think the unthinkable and imagine the game of rugby without any Pacific players or teams.

Try that on for size and go back to the board room for another look at those rules.

http://sobserver.ws/en/13_11_2017/edito ... irness.htm
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14568
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by Mellsblue »

This thread was very entertaining until we had the bollocks usually reserved for the politics thread that is a discussion about foreign policy.

Puja, take Rowan off ignore, don’t interact with him and just sit back and let the lols roll in. Unless, that is, he goes back to saying ‘kiss me if I’m wrong’. For your own sanity, put him straight back on ignore if he starts that up again.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by rowan »

Kiss me if I'm wrong, but some of the threads on the rugby forum will inevitably have a political edge to them. Trying to discuss the 2023 World Cup host, for example. Then it all just goes to pot . . . :? :roll:
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by rowan »

:o The Samoan PM just compared Twickers to the Roman Coliseum . . . :?

The Chairman of the Samoa Rugby Union, Tuilaepa Sa’ilele Malielegaoi, has compared World Rugby’s (W.R.) current gate sharing agreement to the “days of the Roman Coliseum.”

He has also rubbished claims there is “corruption” and “mismanagement” in the handling the bankrupt Union’s finances.

“When we tour England and play against their teams, the stadiums are at full capacity earning millions of pounds for the host Union and Manu Samoa gets hardly anything in return,” Tuilaepa said. “Why? The gate sharing since the amateur days is still current where the host Union takes all.

Smaller Unions like Manu Samoa, Tonga and Fiji are expected to play up to their standards to fatten their bank accounts at our expense.

“This is like being back again in the Roman Coliseum days where the entertainers are fed to the lions.

Samoa, Fiji and Tonga provide the entertainment.

If the gate sharing is not changed, the poorer unions cannot afford to continue on playing under these circumstances.”

Tuilaepa, who is also the Prime Minister, made the comparison in an interview with the state-owned Savali newspaper released by the Office of the Press Secretary.

It is in response to criticisms of the Samoa Rugby Union’s handling of finances, following Tuilaepa’s declaration that the Union is bankrupt.

Last week, a public appeal for help saw $400,000 pledged to aid Manu Samoa’s tour of the Northern Hemisphere.

During the interview, Tuilaepa shares a frank picture of the Union’s budget.

“You see our annual budget for this year is close to 11 million Samoan Tala.

The World Rugby funds only about 4.6 million Tala and S.R.U. bears the major balance of the budget from its own fundraisings which include sponsorships from our Government and two local companies."

“The deficit is funded by bank loans.

If these Commercial Banks were to call up payment, we have no choice but to fold up. Our loans are unsecured and we are operating from leased property owned by the Samoa Land Corporation."

“We have been dependent on bank financing for the last three years and the figures are available in our Annual Accounts which have clean audit opinions, copies of which have been submitted to W.R. for their records. So we are talking about hard real issues backed by our financial record.”

Tuilaepa also confirmed simmering tensions between the S.R.U. and World Rugby.

“First World Rugby was unhappy with the process taken by the Board where the Interview Panel recommended one candidate and the Board chose another.

For instance, Fuimaono Tafua our present Head Coach was not recommended by the Panel,” he said.

“Of the seven shortlisted candidates interviewed, the Panel overlooked Fuimaono who was the best of the applicants in terms of performance. Fuimaono was our Head Coach when Manu Samoa beat the Wallabies in 2011. The Wallabies then was one of the top two Tier 1 teams in the world."

“From the communications with W.R. their view is that the S.R.U. should only be a rubber stamp.

That is to approve whatever a Sub-Committee recommends. We disagreed.

“Indeed we attach importance to Coach Performance on the field.

In a small country where rugby is popular, the public is most vocal when its rugby team does not perform. And the Board has to bear all the bad publicity from the fans.

We are answerable to our public and sponsors who fund over 60% of our Budget."

“Many of our players do not fully understand the Coaches’ directives in English. Some of our expatriate appointees by the WR do not fully appreciate cultural practices of our players, which by tradition generate greater mental preparation for our players.

That is why the Board recommends other management appointees who are locals to help out.

There are many negative feedbacks that the Board has to try and resolve on many cultural matters beyond the understanding of W.R. officials."

“In Samoa nothing is secret in a small society.

A leakage is often hard to stop – Thus when the local papers published our decisions prematurely before we formally advise the W.R. of our decision, these are matters beyond our control, this is regrettable."

“Such is the world where the social media reigns supreme, a common feature of modern communications that is most active in small countries to survive due to paucity of news for their publications. Yet W.R. gives extraordinary attention to this issue of the news leakage to embarrass this Union."

Tuilaepa added that over the years, about 95per cent of the panelists’ recommendations are accepted by the Board.

“Only in exceptional circumstances that the recommendations are not accepted,” he said.

Asked critics who have raised suspicions about corruption and mismanagement within the Rugby Union, Tuilaepa rejected this.

“I have mentioned before that for the last three years our audited accounts had clean audit opinions,” he said.

“That is final proof as in any organization that our financial statements showed a true and fair view of the financial results and that proper accounting of the organizations financing have been kept."

“For these past three years of improved management and financial reforms, we have managed to pay all our expenses and fulfilled all our obligations to participate at W.R. sanctioned events, paid all the players allowances and have no more complaints.

World Rugby should be fully aware of these developments."

“It should be noted that our Board members are all volunteers. They do not receive any monetary payments for their services.

“We also have a small administration staff of seven employees only. In our preparation of the 2015 All Blacks/Manu Samoa Match in Apia, we could only allocate 5 full time staff working around the clock to make the Event successful – a factor which caused some surprise to the N.Z.R.U. officials whether we were serious.

“But what can we do with the kind of budget we operate on? In the end all the arrangements ran smoothly and the organization aspects were a great success.”


http://sobserver.ws/en/16_11_2017/regio ... %80%99.htm
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
zer0
Posts: 938
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:11 pm

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by zer0 »

What a load of tosh. The Colosseum was far fancier. Also put on a better show.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14568
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by Mellsblue »

I’d be happy if the idea of releasing Lions into the arena at Prince Harry’s request gained some traction.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by rowan »

I'd like to release Harry and the rest of his clan into that arena, personally...
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by Digby »

Mellsblue wrote:I’d be happy if the idea of releasing Lions into the arena at Prince Harry’s request gained some traction.
Is Harry who you want to involve for a tinpot little pacific island? at most it seems an engagement for Edward
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14568
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by Mellsblue »

Digby wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:I’d be happy if the idea of releasing Lions into the arena at Prince Harry’s request gained some traction.
Is Harry who you want to involve for a tinpot little pacific island? at most it seems an engagement for Edward
We could get Andrew involved. Might make those running the SRU look good in comparison.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Samoa wants £160K cut

Post by Digby »

Mellsblue wrote:
Digby wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:I’d be happy if the idea of releasing Lions into the arena at Prince Harry’s request gained some traction.
Is Harry who you want to involve for a tinpot little pacific island? at most it seems an engagement for Edward
We could get Andrew involved. Might make those running the SRU look good in comparison.
Or Fergie
Post Reply