New England Change Kit

[Puja]

Otherwise known as "The reason Argentina are guaranteed a Twickenham fixture each year because we need to show it off to sell it and we've done our good deed to Fiji for this century."

http://www.punditarena.com/rugby/smcmah ... amn-slick/

I've seen a lot worse, although the explanation for the "red fade" sounds like complete bollocks. No doubt the Kiwis will start crying again about us disrespecting them by using black, which is a bonus.

Puja

[Mellsblue]

Awful. I can't stand the bull**** marketing blurb that comes with it.

[Raggs]

Not that bad, and infinitely better than the Irish change kit.

[Digby]

If they're right about the red fade should teams be told not to do that on grounds of safety?

[Scrumhead]

Awful. I can't stand the bull**** marketing blurb that comes with it.

I can't stand the marketing bolloc%s either, but I like the kit. Definitely better than last year's ugly blue kit.

[Oakboy]

Why can't we have some traditional horizontal stripes in red, white and blue?

[Mellsblue]

Save your money:

[Raggs]

Is the number of times worn important? I'd rather just get something I like the look of.

[fivepointer]

I liked the purple shirts. Surely time they made a comeback?

[Mellsblue]

It's not really a replica kit if it's never been worn. I'd argue the same for a kit that been worn once. You must be a marketing man's (or lady's) dream