



This is record-breaking stuff. Textbooks* will need to be rewritten.Banquo wrote: ↑Fri Oct 14, 2022 2:13 pmI knew Truss would be a catastrophe, but you couldn't make this up.Son of Mathonwy wrote: ↑Fri Oct 14, 2022 1:18 pmChance would be a fine thing. Unfortunately we're stuck with the Tories till '25, regardless of the number of leaders they go through.
That's before today.....
I wasn't being critical just pointing out it could be single figures Conservatives soon.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Fri Oct 14, 2022 5:11 pm Yup, sorry, should have clarified - conducted on Wednesday.
I was impressed that something commissioned by GBNews found that (and that it was then allowed to be published)
![]()
I missed so many of those things happening. Number 49 in particular was something that might've be top 10 in any other week in Tory.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Fri Oct 14, 2022 7:41 pm If you thought my post on reorganising the Prem / Champ was too long...
Ooft. Yes, that's exactly what the pill popping UK community needs: more access to potentially harmful drugs.
Jesus fuck. A health secretary who apparently knows the square root of fuck all about the dangers of breeding antibiotic-resistant bacteria. No doubt when she says "has handed out her own supplies", she means "the pills that I didn't take for the full course because I was feeling so much better," and when she says "people who were feeling unwell", she no doubt means, "people who weren't given them by a doctor because they were suffering from viruses, not bacteriological infections."
Over here, most doctors prescribe antibiotics for everything, and it's terrible. I even had an argument with a doctor about my sinusitis. I mean...if I'd seen her more than once about the same problem, perhaps you'd like to look at what might be causing the problem...Mellsblue wrote: ↑Sat Oct 15, 2022 5:34 pm Nowhere near a fan of this plan but…
a) are we to believe pharmacists are more likely to give them out than docs
b) docs already say they give them out just to shut us up/get us out the door/avoid telling us we’re hypochondriacs
c) we’re miles behind France etc on use of pharmacists and that needs to change
Coffey continues to flush UC credit down the loo
I think the lack of access to doctors acts as a brake - it's a lot easier to berate a pharmacist, whereas going to a doctor would be mold likely to result in a person just getting over their cold. Plus, the message about easing access is not a good one - it might not be right or correct, but the public perception is that a pharmacist is less of a serious medical practitioner than a doctor and therefore it's not serious medicine to be taken seriously if it doesn't require a prescription.Mellsblue wrote: ↑Sat Oct 15, 2022 5:34 pm Nowhere near a fan of this plan but…
a) are we to believe pharmacists are more likely to give them out than docs
b) docs already say they give them out just to shut us up/get us out the door/avoid telling us we’re hypochondriacs
c) we’re miles behind France etc on use of pharmacists and that needs to change
Coffey continues to flush UC credit down the loo
B) it’s true for all threeWhich Tyler wrote: ↑Sat Oct 15, 2022 6:33 pm A) yes (or at least, inappropriately) Pharmacists aren't trained in diagnosis, which means they can't diagnose, and therefore don't know if an infection is bacterial or not
B) not for a long, long time (it's steroids and mild opiates now)
C) agreed
I'm speechless. This is just so dangerous.