Cricket fred

Post Reply
Banquo
Posts: 19208
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Big D wrote:
Banquo wrote:England doubling down on dropping Broad'n'Jimmy - Robinson crocked.... next man in line....Liam Norwell (nope...no clue)
Dropping your two best then playing Woakes and Overton rather than having a look at AN Other is a bit questionable,
a tad
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4296
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

nosebleed territory now..
Banquo
Posts: 19208
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

well done yjb
fivepointer
Posts: 5915
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by fivepointer »

Very good recovery. We could have subsided to 120 all out but Bairstow played a great hand.
Banquo
Posts: 19208
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

fivepointer wrote:Very good recovery. We could have subsided to 120 all out but Bairstow played a great hand.
but then a bit of a collapse again today. YJB done good tho
Big D
Posts: 5602
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Big D »

Not sure if Anderson and Broad will be murderous with rage or pissing themselves at this start.
Banquo
Posts: 19208
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Big D wrote:Not sure if Anderson and Broad will be murderous with rage or pissing themselves at this start.
well yes. Whoever thought Woakes and Overton would be a better opening pair than A and B is mad, Andrew Strauss. Woakes is historically hopeless outside the UK (and maybe Durban).
Banquo
Posts: 19208
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

seriously shyte bowling. But you can't be surprised I suppose. No sign of Stokes bowling either.

Woakes and Leach are at the wrong ends...Joe. And Leach's field is wrong....Joe. He really isn't a great skipper.
Big D
Posts: 5602
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Big D »

Banquo wrote:seriously shyte bowling. But you can't be surprised I suppose. No sign of Stokes bowling either.

Woakes and Leach are at the wrong ends...Joe. And Leach's field is wrong....Joe. He really isn't a great skipper.
Leach is on the wrong continent. Shouldn't have been playing.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17743
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

Banquo wrote:
Big D wrote:Not sure if Anderson and Broad will be murderous with rage or pissing themselves at this start.
well yes. Whoever thought Woakes and Overton would be a better opening pair than A and B is mad, Andrew Strauss. Woakes is historically hopeless outside the UK (and maybe Durban).
I can absolutely understand dropping Anderson and Broad for this series, as they're not going to last forever and it gives them a break and a chance to see fresh faces to see who can cut it at this level. We've chucked enough chances at county batsmen over the last few years, so we may as well see if we can rustle up a bowler.

Doing that and then picking Overton and Woakes though defies belief. It's like there were two independent selection panels that didn't talk to one another - one that dropped A & B to see who else there was and then one that picked the most experienced team from the players on tour anyway.

Puja
Backist Monk
Banquo
Posts: 19208
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Puja wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Big D wrote:Not sure if Anderson and Broad will be murderous with rage or pissing themselves at this start.
well yes. Whoever thought Woakes and Overton would be a better opening pair than A and B is mad, Andrew Strauss. Woakes is historically hopeless outside the UK (and maybe Durban).
I can absolutely understand dropping Anderson and Broad for this series, as they're not going to last forever and it gives them a break and a chance to see fresh faces to see who can cut it at this level. We've chucked enough chances at county batsmen over the last few years, so we may as well see if we can rustle up a bowler.

Doing that and then picking Overton and Woakes though defies belief. It's like there were two independent selection panels that didn't talk to one another - one that dropped A & B to see who else there was and then one that picked the most experienced team from the players on tour anyway.

Puja
well quite. And why drop both anyway.
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4296
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

Wo-verton not pulling up trees ..if there's little help from the pitch the basics need to be spot on.
Looks like WI may sneak a first inns. lead :|
fivepointer
Posts: 5915
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by fivepointer »

Its very flat. Not sure any quick would be thrilled to bowl on this.
Banquo
Posts: 19208
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

fivepointer wrote:Its very flat. Not sure any quick would be thrilled to bowl on this.
...maybe, but you'd expect test opening bowlers with a new ball to trouble the two currently batting, surely? Both of them average less than 30 in FC cricket.
Banquo
Posts: 19208
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

breakthrough, lets hope they can get rid of the tailsharpish. Hmm..
Banquo
Posts: 19208
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Wood crocked. FFS.
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4296
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

Good work Nkrumah, real Test batsmanship there, great application.Game chugging along to a draw.
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4296
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

Eng. lead creepy-ing up (> 70) , cent. Joe-zak partnership for 2nd wicket , JR bags another test 50.
Chance to get some practice in.
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4296
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

and more of the same.
Stokes still got it.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5843
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Stom »

Better, in that our batting looks a little more solid. But the bowling is decidedly meh.

I get it, there’s no archer, wood, Curran, Robinson, Stone… but still.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5843
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Stom »

And, honestly, as great as it looked with 6 men around the bat against the twin spin, how many of those balls were going on to hit the stumps?

Jeez, I mean, the batsmen knew all they had to do was get everything behind it and not nick off. As that ball was not hitting the stumps.

Awful.

And as for the seamers. It seems the England default now is to not get hit. They just bowl nice dibbly dobblers on that fifth stump, about half a foot above the bails.

Why? The batsman doesn’t have to bloody hit it. Movement is almost non existent, there’s no pace… just awful.
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4296
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

'No point having momentum without wins' ..best start with forward momentum. 53-6, albeit on a lively wicket gives plenty of work to do. :|
fivepointer
Posts: 5915
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by fivepointer »

Well we were hoping for a bit of life in the wicket......we seem to have got that.
Banquo
Posts: 19208
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

FFS then well done Leach'n'Mahmood
Banquo
Posts: 19208
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

good comeback, but even Foakes is dropping catches!
Post Reply