Trump
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Trump
I've been assuming the 'we won the election' nonsense is merely a grift to bulk out the donations to Trump into hundreds of millions of dollars. But listening to those tapes of him and those officials in Georgia I'd almost be saying kudos for staying in character to such an extent, surely he can't actually believe his own claims.
Though one more, if he managed to actually 'win' the elections and assumed the next term in office will he then return the hundreds of millions of dollar to fight for that aim?
Though one more, if he managed to actually 'win' the elections and assumed the next term in office will he then return the hundreds of millions of dollar to fight for that aim?
- morepork
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Trump
There have to be consequences here. Fat Orange Jebus and his 12 angry men cannot be allowed to fuck everyone over just so they can use social media to generate income and con frothy pig-fucking ignorant voters (admittedly a lot) in order they be allowed to keep feeding at the corporate trough.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10518
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Trump
Its looking like Trump has f*cked the Republicans.Digby wrote:Fuck me they might have done this, though it's not beyond a recount yet it would seem. Stacey Abrams you're a bloody star, frankly even if it doesn't pan out
- Puja
- Posts: 17734
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Trump
Just that fact is worth the Dems having fucked up all the other eminently winnable Senate races in November.Sandydragon wrote:Its looking like Trump has f*cked the Republicans.Digby wrote:Fuck me they might have done this, though it's not beyond a recount yet it would seem. Stacey Abrams you're a bloody star, frankly even if it doesn't pan out
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Trump
In part, but they did a lot of good work in failing to get across those lines, and they've opened some doors on who can now run in the future. And there is 74 million people wanted Trump, so put a person with similar ideals but less publicity around their toxicity, venality and general incompetence in front of the voters and they will want to vote GOP, and actually a lot will vote checks and balances, so looking at it being a Democratic Congress, voting a Democratic presidential nominee, they will be inclined to vote red in the SenatePuja wrote:Just that fact is worth the Dems having fucked up all the other eminently winnable Senate races in November.Sandydragon wrote:Its looking like Trump has f*cked the Republicans.Digby wrote:Fuck me they might have done this, though it's not beyond a recount yet it would seem. Stacey Abrams you're a bloody star, frankly even if it doesn't pan out
Puja
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Trump
The Republicans didn't have to wed themselves to Trump, and the two in Georgia have done so in spades. Mind that you can campaign with the KKK and it's still close doesn't suggest we'll be out of the woods anytime soonSandydragon wrote:Its looking like Trump has f*cked the Republicans.Digby wrote:Fuck me they might have done this, though it's not beyond a recount yet it would seem. Stacey Abrams you're a bloody star, frankly even if it doesn't pan out
- Donny osmond
- Posts: 3222
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:58 pm
Re: RE: Re: Trump
From a distance, one of the more interesting parts of all this is how many of those 74 mill are Republican supporters who can be relied on in future elections, and how many are just trump supporters who came out for him, weird tho that might seem? Would someone with less, er, "charisma" but the same politics still get all 74 mill votes? I wouldn't be surprised if we saw a few mill of those votes disappear now that there isn't a reality TV star front and centre. And yes I realise what a freakin desperately bleak outlook on society that is.Digby wrote:In part, but they did a lot of good work in failing to get across those lines, and they've opened some doors on who can now run in the future. And there is 74 million people wanted Trump, so put a person with similar ideals but less publicity around their toxicity, venality and general incompetence in front of the voters and they will want to vote GOP, and actually a lot will vote checks and balances, so looking at it being a Democratic Congress, voting a Democratic presidential nominee, they will be inclined to vote red in the SenatePuja wrote:Just that fact is worth the Dems having fucked up all the other eminently winnable Senate races in November.Sandydragon wrote: Its looking like Trump has f*cked the Republicans.
Puja
Sent from my CPH1951 using Tapatalk
It was so much easier to blame Them. It was bleakly depressing to think They were Us. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: RE: Re: Trump
Donny osmond wrote:From a distance, one of the more interesting parts of all this is how many of those 74 mill are Republican supporters who can be relied on in future elections, and how many are just trump supporters who came out for him, weird tho that might seem? Would someone with less, er, "charisma" but the same politics still get all 74 mill votes? I wouldn't be surprised if we saw a few mill of those votes disappear now that there isn't a reality TV star front and centre. And yes I realise what a freakin desperately bleak outlook on society that is.Digby wrote:In part, but they did a lot of good work in failing to get across those lines, and they've opened some doors on who can now run in the future. And there is 74 million people wanted Trump, so put a person with similar ideals but less publicity around their toxicity, venality and general incompetence in front of the voters and they will want to vote GOP, and actually a lot will vote checks and balances, so looking at it being a Democratic Congress, voting a Democratic presidential nominee, they will be inclined to vote red in the SenatePuja wrote:
Just that fact is worth the Dems having fucked up all the other eminently winnable Senate races in November.
Puja
Sent from my CPH1951 using Tapatalk
It could get worse, a still more charismatic star might emerge from reality TV, one who isn't a lazy, thick as shit, often corrupt, fat, somewhat rapey... maybe even one who believes in sky fairies or the sky fairy I suppose
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10518
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Trump
The Republicans have been moving towards a Trumpesque president for decades. The political exchange in the US has become more toxic and less collaborative. With the rules on candidature and fund raising now within the GOP, the presidential candidacy is there for someone who is from 'outside' the traditional Republican hierarchy. The Republicans have embraced the Tea Party fully (not just Trump, wasn't it McCain who ran for President with Palin as his VP nominee?) and it will take an act of supreme political courage to cut them adrift.Digby wrote:In part, but they did a lot of good work in failing to get across those lines, and they've opened some doors on who can now run in the future. And there is 74 million people wanted Trump, so put a person with similar ideals but less publicity around their toxicity, venality and general incompetence in front of the voters and they will want to vote GOP, and actually a lot will vote checks and balances, so looking at it being a Democratic Congress, voting a Democratic presidential nominee, they will be inclined to vote red in the SenatePuja wrote:Just that fact is worth the Dems having fucked up all the other eminently winnable Senate races in November.Sandydragon wrote: Its looking like Trump has f*cked the Republicans.
Puja
Its very possible that the next Republican candidate for President will be very much like Trump, and potentially even more dangerous if they have even one ounce of intelligence.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10518
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: RE: Re: Trump
Or would the Republicans get 74 million votes if:Donny osmond wrote:From a distance, one of the more interesting parts of all this is how many of those 74 mill are Republican supporters who can be relied on in future elections, and how many are just trump supporters who came out for him, weird tho that might seem? Would someone with less, er, "charisma" but the same politics still get all 74 mill votes? I wouldn't be surprised if we saw a few mill of those votes disappear now that there isn't a reality TV star front and centre. And yes I realise what a freakin desperately bleak outlook on society that is.Digby wrote:In part, but they did a lot of good work in failing to get across those lines, and they've opened some doors on who can now run in the future. And there is 74 million people wanted Trump, so put a person with similar ideals but less publicity around their toxicity, venality and general incompetence in front of the voters and they will want to vote GOP, and actually a lot will vote checks and balances, so looking at it being a Democratic Congress, voting a Democratic presidential nominee, they will be inclined to vote red in the SenatePuja wrote:
Just that fact is worth the Dems having fucked up all the other eminently winnable Senate races in November.
Puja
Sent from my CPH1951 using Tapatalk
The Democratic candidate could potentially keel over part way through his term in office leaving a BAME woman in charge?
The Democrats didn't have a number of high profile 'leftist' Congresswomen (and of course Bernie) who the socialist charge can be applied to in varying degrees?
There hadn't been a series of riots which seemed to track party political lines in excusing/supporting them?
I wonder how many people voted Trump because they 'feared' what the Democrats would bring.
- Puja
- Posts: 17734
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: RE: Re: Trump
Alternately, would the Republicans have got 74 million votes if people weren't feeling left behind and thus preferred a candidate posing as an outsider who'd bring change to hidebound Washington interests* rather than a ticket that was the epitome of the establishment and offered little positive other than "We're civil and polite"?Sandydragon wrote:Or would the Republicans get 74 million votes if:Donny osmond wrote:From a distance, one of the more interesting parts of all this is how many of those 74 mill are Republican supporters who can be relied on in future elections, and how many are just trump supporters who came out for him, weird tho that might seem? Would someone with less, er, "charisma" but the same politics still get all 74 mill votes? I wouldn't be surprised if we saw a few mill of those votes disappear now that there isn't a reality TV star front and centre. And yes I realise what a freakin desperately bleak outlook on society that is.Digby wrote:
In part, but they did a lot of good work in failing to get across those lines, and they've opened some doors on who can now run in the future. And there is 74 million people wanted Trump, so put a person with similar ideals but less publicity around their toxicity, venality and general incompetence in front of the voters and they will want to vote GOP, and actually a lot will vote checks and balances, so looking at it being a Democratic Congress, voting a Democratic presidential nominee, they will be inclined to vote red in the Senate
Sent from my CPH1951 using Tapatalk
The Democratic candidate could potentially keel over part way through his term in office leaving a BAME woman in charge?
The Democrats didn't have a number of high profile 'leftist' Congresswomen (and of course Bernie) who the socialist charge can be applied to in varying degrees?
There hadn't been a series of riots which seemed to track party political lines in excusing/supporting them?
I wonder how many people voted Trump because they 'feared' what the Democrats would bring.
Puja
*Yes, I'm aware that it's an incredibly obvious lie, but it's one that suckers in a lot of Trump supporters.
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 1972
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm
Re: Trump
Time for Joe to step up and be more than not trump now, stars aligned for him
(those 2 rep candidates
......vile)
(those 2 rep candidates

- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10518
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: RE: Re: Trump
I absolutely agree with you. This sense of being left behind is incredibly powerful, here as well as in the US. There is a reason why certain parties (i.e. the BNP and UKIP etc) have managed to convert a lot of voters - the main parties have largely taken these people for granted and ignored them. Putting aside the really unpleasant politics of the BNP, they managed ot get elected representative in Stoke On Trent because they went door to door and listened to the complaints and promised to do something about it.Puja wrote:Alternately, would the Republicans have got 74 million votes if people weren't feeling left behind and thus preferred a candidate posing as an outsider who'd bring change to hidebound Washington interests* rather than a ticket that was the epitome of the establishment and offered little positive other than "We're civil and polite"?Sandydragon wrote:Or would the Republicans get 74 million votes if:Donny osmond wrote:
From a distance, one of the more interesting parts of all this is how many of those 74 mill are Republican supporters who can be relied on in future elections, and how many are just trump supporters who came out for him, weird tho that might seem? Would someone with less, er, "charisma" but the same politics still get all 74 mill votes? I wouldn't be surprised if we saw a few mill of those votes disappear now that there isn't a reality TV star front and centre. And yes I realise what a freakin desperately bleak outlook on society that is.
Sent from my CPH1951 using Tapatalk
The Democratic candidate could potentially keel over part way through his term in office leaving a BAME woman in charge?
The Democrats didn't have a number of high profile 'leftist' Congresswomen (and of course Bernie) who the socialist charge can be applied to in varying degrees?
There hadn't been a series of riots which seemed to track party political lines in excusing/supporting them?
I wonder how many people voted Trump because they 'feared' what the Democrats would bring.
Puja
*Yes, I'm aware that it's an incredibly obvious lie, but it's one that suckers in a lot of Trump supporters.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10518
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Trump
What a turn up for the books. Standby for more crying from the fat orange idiot on hijacked votes etc, but this now gives Biden the opportunity to implement his policies (subject to Supreme Court and filibustering).morepork wrote:Stacey Abrams. You madame, are a fucking rock star.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: RE: Re: Trump
Puja wrote:Alternately, would the Republicans have got 74 million votes if people weren't feeling left behind and thus preferred a candidate posing as an outsider who'd bring change to hidebound Washington interests* rather than a ticket that was the epitome of the establishment and offered little positive other than "We're civil and polite"?Sandydragon wrote:Or would the Republicans get 74 million votes if:Donny osmond wrote:
From a distance, one of the more interesting parts of all this is how many of those 74 mill are Republican supporters who can be relied on in future elections, and how many are just trump supporters who came out for him, weird tho that might seem? Would someone with less, er, "charisma" but the same politics still get all 74 mill votes? I wouldn't be surprised if we saw a few mill of those votes disappear now that there isn't a reality TV star front and centre. And yes I realise what a freakin desperately bleak outlook on society that is.
Sent from my CPH1951 using Tapatalk
The Democratic candidate could potentially keel over part way through his term in office leaving a BAME woman in charge?
The Democrats didn't have a number of high profile 'leftist' Congresswomen (and of course Bernie) who the socialist charge can be applied to in varying degrees?
There hadn't been a series of riots which seemed to track party political lines in excusing/supporting them?
I wonder how many people voted Trump because they 'feared' what the Democrats would bring.
Puja
*Yes, I'm aware that it's an incredibly obvious lie, but it's one that suckers in a lot of Trump supporters.
With a different Democratic candidate Trump might well have come in with a lower total, then again so might the Democrats. Like most people I'm not especially impressed with Biden, and like many I'd dismissed him as even being able to gain the nomination (as I did with Trump too), but when Biden has won a huge number of votes to suppose another ticket might have fared better is at least a little fanciful
-
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2019 5:24 pm
Re: Trump
The Atlanta major as well played an important role. Less than Abrams, but important.morepork wrote:Stacey Abrams. You madame, are a fucking rock star.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Trump
The Dems aren't going away from places like Georgia, they're on the rise in places like Texas too. Stacey Abrams wasn't perhaps the founder of this current shift, but she really put in some groundwork to drive this change. Her attention to detail in building that momentum, and whilst she was despite repeat efforts not getting anyone to much fund what was happening to her work in Georgia early doors, is something to behold (well looking back on it, almost no one paid attention to he for a few years). She's going to be presented with a lot of job offers one presumes, maybe something building to AG, maybe elsewhere in the cabinet, but I wonder if they might not have her simply run the DNCSandydragon wrote:What a turn up for the books. Standby for more crying from the fat orange idiot on hijacked votes etc, but this now gives Biden the opportunity to implement his policies (subject to Supreme Court and filibustering).morepork wrote:Stacey Abrams. You madame, are a fucking rock star.
The demographics are moving away from the GOP. So yes they might in the midterms if voter turnout dips win back both houses, but in the longer term they've some serious problems to contend with, are they a serious party advocating conservative principles or are they a mishmash of Trumpism and the Tea Party. And if they are to be serious how to they marry the interests of the blue collar worker and the rich?
Equally with the Dems courting votes less from the blue collar workers how do they move to try and accommodate the middles classes and those deemed, wisely or otherwise, progressives? Which is to say it's hardly plain sailing from here on for the Dems
- morepork
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Trump
gransoporro wrote:The Atlanta major as well played an important role. Less than Abrams, but important.morepork wrote:Stacey Abrams. You madame, are a fucking rock star.
KLB? For sure.
The Trumpet is just a fucking shambles. The incompetence is mind blowing. Just him and his fuckwit family standing now, resplendent in glaring dog shite white.
-
- Posts: 12174
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Trump
Oof. Things are kicking off.
- morepork
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Trump
A group of fat white people with no cogent message or strategy storm the capitol on a whim and are met with minimal force. Back in the Summer civil rights protestors communicating a clear message of minority abuse by the authorities are met with clubs, tear gas and rubber bullets.
I'm thinking the civil rights protestors may have had a point...
Lord how I hate fat bearded crackers in trucker caps and militia costumes. A tired ignorant walking cliche.
I'm thinking the civil rights protestors may have had a point...
Lord how I hate fat bearded crackers in trucker caps and militia costumes. A tired ignorant walking cliche.
- Donny osmond
- Posts: 3222
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:58 pm
Re: Trump
America is really cooking off.
You know that saying "May you live in interesting times"? That can get right in the fucking sea.
Sent from my CPH1951 using Tapatalk
You know that saying "May you live in interesting times"? That can get right in the fucking sea.
Sent from my CPH1951 using Tapatalk
It was so much easier to blame Them. It was bleakly depressing to think They were Us. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.