Mellsblue wrote:Son of Mathonwy wrote:Mellsblue wrote:Time and a plethora of inquiries will be required to find out who did what, when, how and why.
Just looking at numbers on a graph and deciding who acted correctly without context or letting the whole thing play out isn’t the best way of dealing with this in either the short or long term.
Yes, inquiries are needed, but that's for the future.
When I look at that graph I think
"if we want to save lives we need to evaluate what South Korea is doing ASAP, and where appropriate, implement it", not
"we can't possibly draw any conclusions from this right now, let's hold an inquiry in a couple of years".
Mellsblue wrote:As an example, I wonder if everyone who is praising the way China dealt with the crisis would accept the response of martial law, executions of dissenters and campaigns of disinformation from de Pfeffel’s govt. I somehow doubt it.
That's a ridiculous straw man.
1) South Korea (a democracy) is the most obvious stand out in that graph and is much more comparable to the UK than China is, so is clearly the first country to look at for best practice in Covid 19 response.
2) Why would adopting
some of China's methods imply
in any way that other, repressive methods are acceptable?
The U.K. has evaluated what S Korea have done, hence the belated rush for a rigorous testing regime.
If you just look at the data on the graph, we should also be following Sweden or Holland who have far less stringent protocols in place than the U.K. and are tracking below us. By quite a long way in Sweden’s case. You could also ask whether all the testing is worth it as Germany are tracking just below us. Given the anomalies I’ve just pointed out, you can not draw anything conclusive from those graphs. My point is that every internet ‘expert’ has decided definitely what is wrong and what is right. This could be with us for another 18months. It’s a marathon not a sprint.
Sweden's deaths have been increasing at 20% for the last three days; there's no way it's still on a low-ish trajectory.
Look at these numbers, or look at the graph again, either way it's just as obvious:
UK daily deaths increase: 15%, cumulative deaths per 1M population: 105
Holland daily deaths increase: 10%, cumulative deaths per 1M population: 131
Sweden daily deaths increase: 20%, cumulative deaths per 1M population: 68
South Korea daily deaths increase: 4%, cumulative deaths per 1M population: 4
If you can't see that SK is performing vastly better than the UK, Holland and Sweden, I really can't help you.
This could be with us for another 18months. It’s a marathon not a sprint.
Agreed this will be with us until a vaccine or effective treatment arrive (or the world gets herd immunity at the cost of millions of lives), and that could easily be 18 months. Unless we adopt the right strategy it will be an
iron man marathon for us.
Whereas, South Korea has the virus under control and is
not in lockdown. So it has saved lives (there are 35 dead brits for every dead South Korean) and its economy too. Its marathon will be a gentle stroll.
1) The South Korea govt. are tracking their citizens by phone. I very much doubt that would wash in the U.K. That both are democracies has little do do with it. A good friend of mine lived in S Korea for five years, they are a completely different culture. Far more used to obeying their govt and living with greater govt interference in their lives. I suppose you would do if you have a psycho with a nuclear arms programme on your doorstep. You only have to look at the amount of people flouting the rules, a growing movement asking if the long term economic fallout is worth such draconian measures and claims more lives will be lost in the long term by this steep economic down turn than you COVID to realise that the U.K. might not be as compliant as other nations. Behavioural scientists were part of the numerous committees that fed into SAGE. From what I’ve read, they were warning that the U.K. population would not tolerate overly stringent lockdowns, especially if we we’re ebbing in and out of them for 18 months.
Are you seriously saying that we would be happier killing thousands than to have the government track our phones (which we routinely let facebook do)?
South Korea is not in lockdown, so the impact of its strategy on the population is actually far less drastic than ours.
South Korea's method, in brief, is to test a lot (obviously), but also to contact trace (which is where we're falling down):
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/23/brie ... mpics.html
2) Which of China’s less oppressive measures would you have us adopt?
Testing (which we have only recently begun to take seriously) and rigorous contact tracing. Isolate those testing positive or having been in recent contact with those testing positive.
Where testing is not available, use symptoms as a proxy. it's not as good but it can still allow effective contact tracing - isolating citizens before they show symptoms.
Early use of this technique is why South Korea has been so successful. (Taiwan has been even more successful with it)