Cricket fred

Post Reply
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14573
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Mellsblue »

Ffs
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Banquo »

Mellsblue wrote:Ffs
lol, great effort by Woakes, but 8-5 must be some sort of unwanted record sh*t start
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Banquo »

Made a bit of a game of it, but recovering from 8-5 was always a long shot
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Digby »

8-5 is going to happen sometimes when you go out to attack as England do. Perhaps they needed to adjust faster to what was a more reasonable score to set on this pitch, but I wouldn't want them to react too much to one game. On balance I much prefer they try to score some runs Vs a few years back watching Cook and Trott looking to set a sensible 270 score
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Banquo »

Digby wrote:8-5 is going to happen sometimes when you go out to attack as England do. Perhaps they needed to adjust faster to what was a more reasonable score to set on this pitch, but I wouldn't want them to react too much to one game. On balance I much prefer they try to score some runs Vs a few years back watching Cook and Trott looking to set a sensible 270 score
Pretty fckin rarely. Its one of them things.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Digby »

Banquo wrote:
Digby wrote:8-5 is going to happen sometimes when you go out to attack as England do. Perhaps they needed to adjust faster to what was a more reasonable score to set on this pitch, but I wouldn't want them to react too much to one game. On balance I much prefer they try to score some runs Vs a few years back watching Cook and Trott looking to set a sensible 270 score
Pretty fckin rarely. Its one of them things.
Indeed, if it happened 1 in 20 games they'd have to look at it, as is just carry on regardless
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14573
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Mellsblue »

IPL auction:
Stokes - £1.4mil
Root - £0
Woakes - £820,000
Jos Buttler - £485,000
Moeen Ali - £187,000
Jason Roy - £165,000
User avatar
belgarion
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:25 pm
Location: NW England

Re: Cicket fred

Post by belgarion »

Mellsblue wrote:IPL auction:
Stokes - £1.4mil
Root - £0
Woakes - £820,000
Jos Buttler - £485,000
Moeen Ali - £187,000
Jason Roy - £165,000
a
And 800,00k for Jofra Archer born in WI but wants to play for England. Looks a star in the making (inT20 at least)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/42828735
Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Banquo »

Good fight back win, despite not batting the 50 overs out. Curran looks a good un in ODI's
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Digby »

Stadium looked awesome, but I've seen better pitches for an ODI, clearly the groundsman needs time to learn what works in the new place.

An open question from the game though, who had the worst game with the bat, Ali, Morgan or Smith? Smith at least has the explanation he's tired after all those runs in the Ashes win.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14573
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Mellsblue »

belgarion wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:IPL auction:
Stokes - £1.4mil
Root - £0
Woakes - £820,000
Jos Buttler - £485,000
Moeen Ali - £187,000
Jason Roy - £165,000
a
And 800,00k for Jofra Archer born in WI but wants to play for England. Looks a star in the making (inT20 at least)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/42828735
Eoin Morgan fails to pick up on contract.

On Archer, Michael Atherton makes the point that that he is going to struggle to make the necessary days of living in England for qualification purposes if he keeps picking up contracts and the financial incentives of an ECB contract will no longer be quite so tempting.
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Banquo »

kin ell
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14573
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Mellsblue »

Ffs
zer0
Posts: 938
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:11 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by zer0 »

I, for one, enjoyed that opening 90 minutes.
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Banquo »

zer0 wrote:I, for one, enjoyed that opening 90 minutes.
aye, in for a deserved hammering, Williamson is a hell of a player too.
fivepointer
Posts: 5912
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by fivepointer »

Werent the NZ tests supposed to be the easier assignment over the winter?

That must be our lowest score since WI in the early 90's up against Ambrose.
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Banquo »

fivepointer wrote:Werent the NZ tests supposed to be the easier assignment over the winter?

That must be our lowest score since WI in the early 90's up against Ambrose.
yep, suspect its our third lowest ever, not checked tho.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Digby »

I'd forgotten this was on until clearing up the breakkfast bowls/mugs earlier and Today got around to its sports section, when they said things were going badly I still wasn't anticipating the score they went onto read, but at least it made me laugh.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14573
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Mellsblue »

Banquo wrote:
fivepointer wrote:Werent the NZ tests supposed to be the easier assignment over the winter?

That must be our lowest score since WI in the early 90's up against Ambrose.
yep, suspect its our third lowest ever, not checked tho.
Sixth according the Radio 5. Not sure which is more depressing. Being all out for 58 or that it’s only our sixth lowest score ever.
Banquo
Posts: 19200
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Banquo »

Digby wrote:I'd forgotten this was on until clearing up the breakkfast bowls/mugs earlier and Today got around to its sports section, when they said things were going badly I still wasn't anticipating the score they went onto read, but at least it made me laugh.
27-9, represents a great recovery
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Cicket fred

Post by Digby »

Banquo wrote:
Digby wrote:I'd forgotten this was on until clearing up the breakkfast bowls/mugs earlier and Today got around to its sports section, when they said things were going badly I still wasn't anticipating the score they went onto read, but at least it made me laugh.
27-9, represents a great recovery
I didn't even know that.

All I'm left hoping now is Root comes out to defend his leadership and the batting lineup as strong and stable
J Dory
Posts: 988
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:54 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by J Dory »

I was watching the up until 27 for 9. Bowling by Boult and Southee was pretty special to be fair to the English batsmen.
User avatar
canta_brian
Posts: 1262
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:52 pm

Re: RE: Re: Cicket fred

Post by canta_brian »

J Dory wrote:I was watching the up until 27 for 9. Bowling by Boult and Southee was pretty special to be fair to the English batsmen.
Why on earth did you stop?

Actually at 23-8 they were 2 wickets away from the lowest ever test innings total. Which, as it was th 26 scored by NZ against England in 1955 would have been good to beat.
fivepointer
Posts: 5912
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by fivepointer »

J Dory wrote:I was watching the up until 27 for 9. Bowling by Boult and Southee was pretty special to be fair to the English batsmen.
It was excellent, but not 58 all out on the first day of a test match on a good wicket.
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Cicket fred

Post by WaspInWales »

Bit of a pessimistic vibe going on here.

Does no-one think we can snatch a draw? Any tropical storms heading that way?
Post Reply