Cricket fred
-
- Posts: 19200
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cicket fred
Cupboard looking bare, could be in for a rough decade or so...
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cicket fred
True, looking ahead maybe 3-5 years and the only players that look sure of a role are Root, Bairstow and Stokes. But 2-3 players can emerge very quickly in a way that changes a side very quickly, and test cricket does look weaker than 20 years ago
-
- Posts: 19200
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cicket fred
....we may not have to worry about having a test team much longer, its true.Digby wrote:True, looking ahead maybe 3-5 years and the only players that look sure of a role are Root, Bairstow and Stokes. But 2-3 players can emerge very quickly in a way that changes a side very quickly, and test cricket does look weaker than 20 years ago
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cicket fred
Perhaps just as well, putting it behind the paywall seems to have done a decent job of killing off the game. One almost never sees kids playing cricket now, and not just 'cause it's January and you wouldn't expect to for a few months.Banquo wrote:....we may not have to worry about having a test team much longer, its true.Digby wrote:True, looking ahead maybe 3-5 years and the only players that look sure of a role are Root, Bairstow and Stokes. But 2-3 players can emerge very quickly in a way that changes a side very quickly, and test cricket does look weaker than 20 years ago
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14573
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Cicket fred
Pop up to Yorkshire this summer - or what passes for summer up here - and check out the cricket clubs. Kids everywhere. It may be the exception that proves the rule.
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Cicket fred
Did we win?
Moral victors?
Best way to greet a member of the opposing team in a bar?
Best way to waste your drink and finish your tour hopes in one fell swoop?
Best dressed at the very least I hope.
Moral victors?
Best way to greet a member of the opposing team in a bar?
Best way to waste your drink and finish your tour hopes in one fell swoop?
Best dressed at the very least I hope.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14573
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Cicket fred
Given the amount of time we’ve spent in the field I’d hope we’d best tan.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cicket fred
I can go to clubs here and see kids play, I was thinking more local parks and whatnot. There were often games of cricket being played when I were a lad, now there's barely any sport going on, though I'd say rugby has had a slight upturn (rugby has increased off a very low bordering on non existent base)Mellsblue wrote:Pop up to Yorkshire this summer - or what passes for summer up here - and check out the cricket clubs. Kids everywhere. It may be the exception that proves the rule.
- canta_brian
- Posts: 1262
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:52 pm
Re: Cicket fred
Just to balance things a tiny bit. But isn't 2001 the last time the strayans won the Ashes in England?
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14573
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Cicket fred
It's the manner of the defeats - whitewashes, 4 v 0, wins by an innings and 112 runs etc rather than the number of series won/lost. Oz very rarely come over here and take such pastings, other than if there are over cast conditions at Trent Bridge.canta_brian wrote:Just to balance things a tiny bit. But isn't 2001 the last time the strayans won the Ashes in England?
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cicket fred
And to take those posting with the team commenting they were right in many sessions and not far away from AusMellsblue wrote:It's the manner of the defeats - whitewashes, 4 v 0, wins by an innings and 112 runs etc rather than the number of series won/lost. Oz very rarely come over here and take such pastings, other than if there are over cast conditions at Trent Bridge.canta_brian wrote:Just to balance things a tiny bit. But isn't 2001 the last time the strayans won the Ashes in England?
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cicket fred
England owe a few beers to whichever genius in the Aussie selection team decided Nathan Lyon shouldn't play
- Galfon
- Posts: 4296
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Cicket fred
Eng. sneak home with over to spare in 1-dayer..over 600 runs, 99 overs and a result at the MCG.
180 is an impressive effort in any circumstances.(Roy).
180 is an impressive effort in any circumstances.(Roy).
-
- Posts: 19200
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cicket fred
Its been dismissed on messageboards, but I can't help agreeing that the one day squad (and chuck in Stokes) looks a better bet than the test squad for all forms of the game.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cicket fred
Where would Roy bat in test cricket? I don't know where he plays his county cricket in the order of play other than he's not an opener, so would he be chasing a spot Vs Root, Stokes, Ali and Bairstow in the middle order, or can he adapt his game to say being a No.3
Hales is more middle order at county level now too
Hales is more middle order at county level now too
-
- Posts: 19200
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cicket fred
You'd pick Ali in the middle order?....and I wasn't simply referring to the batting,Digby wrote:Where would Roy bat in test cricket? I don't know where he plays his county cricket in the order of play other than he's not an opener, so would he be chasing a spot Vs Root, Stokes, Ali and Bairstow in the middle order, or can he adapt his game to say being a No.3
Hales is more middle order at county level now too
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cicket fred
If he's at #8 I'd just consider we've a long middle order. Others may just think we'd have a strong tail. He shouldn't be higher than 7th, and 8th is better as he'd have more licence to attackBanquo wrote:You'd pick Ali in the middle order?....and I wasn't simply referring to the batting,Digby wrote:Where would Roy bat in test cricket? I don't know where he plays his county cricket in the order of play other than he's not an opener, so would he be chasing a spot Vs Root, Stokes, Ali and Bairstow in the middle order, or can he adapt his game to say being a No.3
Hales is more middle order at county level now too
-
- Posts: 19200
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cicket fred
putting the lower into middleDigby wrote:If he's at #8 I'd just consider we've a long middle order. Others may just think we'd have a strong tail. He shouldn't be higher than 7th, and 8th is better as he'd have more licence to attackBanquo wrote:You'd pick Ali in the middle order?....and I wasn't simply referring to the batting,Digby wrote:Where would Roy bat in test cricket? I don't know where he plays his county cricket in the order of play other than he's not an opener, so would he be chasing a spot Vs Root, Stokes, Ali and Bairstow in the middle order, or can he adapt his game to say being a No.3
Hales is more middle order at county level now too

-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cicket fred
I'd have to assume he's in the team for his batting. If he's in the team for his bowling I don't know what one should say at that point. So when it was Ashley Giles at 8 that was part of the lower order, Ali has a different role, so for me I'd think him part of an elongated middle order, though I'm not remotely fussed to see others think on it and express it differentlyBanquo wrote:putting the lower into middleDigby wrote:If he's at #8 I'd just consider we've a long middle order. Others may just think we'd have a strong tail. He shouldn't be higher than 7th, and 8th is better as he'd have more licence to attackBanquo wrote: You'd pick Ali in the middle order?....and I wasn't simply referring to the batting,.
Ideally I wouldn't have Ali in the team as he's just not a good enough spinner. I take Swann's point he's England's best spinner, and I don't assume I know better, I'd just rather keep trying other options until we did find a better alternative. Swann is likely to cite that'd cause too much disruption and again he'd know better, but as with Hartley I don't like placeholder selections and I'd pretty much always want to try the next option and risk losing to be better
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Cicket fred
Stokes is going down.
What a bellend and what a waste. At 26 he still has many years of first class and test cricket left in him, but if he cops a conviction, he may not get his test place back.
I just hope that there are some mitigating factors involved, but the video released so far show he was just being a drunk dickhead.
What a bellend and what a waste. At 26 he still has many years of first class and test cricket left in him, but if he cops a conviction, he may not get his test place back.
I just hope that there are some mitigating factors involved, but the video released so far show he was just being a drunk dickhead.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14573
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Cicket fred
Shall we see what happens before deciding he’s going to jail.
Having said that, I haven’t seen the video - I’ve no inclination to see someone getting a kicking - but I am affrayed you could be right.
On a serious note, at what point does he revert back to being a Kiwi?
Having said that, I haven’t seen the video - I’ve no inclination to see someone getting a kicking - but I am affrayed you could be right.
On a serious note, at what point does he revert back to being a Kiwi?
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Cicket fred
I don't know if he'll do down for that. Maybe he should, but with vastly overcrowded jails I can't imagine everyone doing as Stokes did well serve jail time, even before Stokes can very clearly show he has good reason not to offend again and live a more productive life
-
- Posts: 19200
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Cicket fred
Serious charge, carries up to 3 years.
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Cicket fred
That's why my post included some 'ifs' and 'mays'.Mellsblue wrote:Shall we see what happens before deciding he’s going to jail.
Having said that, I haven’t seen the video - I’ve no inclination to see someone getting a kicking - but I am affrayed you could be right.
On a serious note, at what point does he revert back to being a Kiwi?
The 'Stokes is going down' was just to get everyone's attention

- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14573
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Cicket fred
It worked!!WaspInWales wrote:That's why my post included some 'ifs' and 'mays'.Mellsblue wrote:Shall we see what happens before deciding he’s going to jail.
Having said that, I haven’t seen the video - I’ve no inclination to see someone getting a kicking - but I am affrayed you could be right.
On a serious note, at what point does he revert back to being a Kiwi?
The 'Stokes is going down' was just to get everyone's attention